w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from January to March 2016 by author

ALAN SMITH

• RE: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Monday, 28 March)
• RE: Publish updated Techniques and Understanding documents (Friday, 26 February)
• RE: Re[2]: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - whichhas long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Re[2]: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? -and SVG (Monday, 1 February)

Alastair Campbell

• Re: Transient states (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Transient states (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Icon and Icon Fonts: New thread (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Thursday, 25 February)
• Comments on: Digital Publishing Accessibility Note (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Extension conformance and section 2.4 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)

Alistair Garrison

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Monday, 28 March)

Andrew Kirkpatrick

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Monday, 28 March)
• Reminder: No WCAG meeting March 22 (Friday, 18 March)
• CfC: Publish updated QuickRef (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: **Updated** WCAG Agenda March 15th, 2016 (Monday, 14 March)
• TPAC questions (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Transient states (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Transient states (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: CfC: Publish updated Techniques and Understanding documents (Tuesday, 1 March)
• CfC: Publish updated Techniques and Understanding documents (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Agenda+ How to Meet was: Re: WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Friday, 19 February)
• WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Thursday, 18 February)
• Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: CfC: Issue 150 (Tuesday, 9 February)
• WCAG Agenda February 9, 2016 (Saturday, 6 February)
• Re: CfC: Change to introductory paragraphs (Saturday, 6 February)
• Re: Re[2]: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Friday, 5 February)
• CfC: Issue 150 (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: CfC: Change to introductory paragraphs (Wednesday, 3 February)
• CfC: Change to introductory paragraphs (Tuesday, 2 February)
• No WCAG meeting Tuesday (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)
• WCAG Agenda January 19, 2016 (Monday, 18 January)
• WCAG Agenda January 12, 2016 (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: CfC: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Tuesday, 5 January)
• CfC: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Meeting minutes January 5 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)

Christophe Strobbe

• Re: Transient states (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Make it more obvious that older versions are out of date / obsolete (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Thursday, 14 January)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Wednesday, 13 January)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - markup-wise (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - markup-wise (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: Question on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers (Tuesday, 12 January)

David MacDonald

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Saturday, 26 March)
• Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Saturday, 26 March)
• Re: What is a "WCAG2.next workshop"? (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: Change in focus for WCAG2.next workshop (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: How to proceed on WCAG 2.next: design thinking exercise (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Transient states (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Transient states (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: CfC: Publish updated Techniques and Understanding documents (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Re[2]: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: CfC: Change to introductory paragraphs (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Question on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: CfC: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Wednesday, 6 January)

Detlev Fischer

• Re: CfC: Change to introductory paragraphs (Wednesday, 3 February)

Eric Eggert

• Agenda+ How to Meet was: Re: WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• agenda+ Quickref was: Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)

faulkner.steve

• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Sunday, 27 March)
• Re: Transient states (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Icon and Icon Fonts: New thread (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Icon Fonts and contrast (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: Icon Fonts and contrast (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - markup-wise (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: Question on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers (Tuesday, 12 January)

Gregg Vanderheiden RTF

• Re: Transient states (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Transient states (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Saturday, 20 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Friday, 29 January)

James Nurthen

• Re: Transient states (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: WCAG Agenda March 1st 2016 (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Issue 80 and F3 (Wednesday, 13 January)

Jeanne Spellman

• Minutes of WCAG.Next meeting at CSUN (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Minutes of teleconference on WCAG Next Workshop 14 March 2016 (Monday, 14 March)

John Foliot

• Reminder: How to proceed on WCAG 2.next: a design thinking exercise (Friday, 18 March)
• What is a "WCAG2.next workshop"? (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: How to proceed on WCAG 2.next: design thinking exercise (Tuesday, 15 March)
• How to proceed on WCAG 2.next: design thinking exercise (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Icon and Icon Fonts: New thread (Tuesday, 1 March)
• RE: Icon and Icon Fonts: New thread (Monday, 29 February)
• RE: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• RE: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Thursday, 25 February)
• RE: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Re[2]: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Re[2]: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Friday, 19 February)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Thursday, 14 January)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Wednesday, 13 January)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - markup-wise (Wednesday, 13 January)
• RE: Question on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers (Tuesday, 12 January)
• RE: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• RE: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Tuesday, 5 January)
• RE: RE: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• RE: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Monday, 4 January)

Jonathan Avila

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Monday, 28 March)
• Draft minutes from 15th March 2016 teleconference (Tuesday, 15 March)
• RE: Transient states (Thursday, 10 March)
• RE: Transient states (Thursday, 10 March)
• RE: Transient states (Wednesday, 9 March)
• RE: Transient states (Wednesday, 9 March)
• RE: Transient states (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RE: Drop advisory technique H46 (Wednesday, 2 March)
• RE: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• RE: Re[2]: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Re[2]: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Re[2]: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Icon Fonts and contrast (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RE: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Thursday, 4 February)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Contrast analysis and Pixel radius (Monday, 11 January)

josh@interaccess.ie

• Re[2]: WCAG Agenda 29th March 2016 (Wednesday, 30 March)
• WCAG Agenda March 8th 2016 (Monday, 7 March)
• WCAG Agenda March 1st 2016 (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re[4]: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re[2]: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re[2]: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re[2]: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re[2]: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re[2]: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Thursday, 18 February)
• WCAG Agenda 16th February 2016 (Friday, 12 February)
• Owner need for Github issue "Headings in design have been used to comment inclusion on partial html sections and do not relate to section content #106" (Friday, 5 February)
• Re[2]: [LVTF] Technique volunteers needed (Friday, 5 February)
• [LVTF] Technique volunteers needed (Friday, 5 February)
• Re[2]: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Friday, 5 February)
• IRC channel for Screenreader user questions (Tuesday, 2 February)
• WCAG Agenda January 26th, 2016 (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: WCAG Agenda January 19, 2016 (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re[7]: Thoughts on pull request? (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re[5]: Thoughts on pull request? (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re[4]: Thoughts on pull request? (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re[2]: Thoughts on pull request? (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: agenda+ Quickref was: Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re[2]: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Monday, 4 January)

Joshue O Connor

• WCAG Agenda 29th March 2016 (Friday, 25 March)
• **Updated** WCAG Agenda March 15th, 2016 (Saturday, 12 March)
• Re: WCAG Agenda March 8th 2016 (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Drop advisory technique H46 (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: CfC: Drop advisory technique H46 (Saturday, 5 March)
• WCAG Agenda March 15 2016 (Saturday, 5 March)
• CfC: Drop advisory technique H46 (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: WCAG Agenda March 1st 2016 (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Monday, 4 January)
• WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Sunday, 3 January)

Judy Brewer

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Sunday, 27 March)

Kathy Wahlbin

• RE: Agenda+ How to Meet was: Re: WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: CfC: Change to introductory paragraphs (Wednesday, 3 February)
• RE: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Monday, 4 January)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• Re: CfC: Publish updated Techniques and Understanding documents (Friday, 26 February)
• RE: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Thursday, 25 February)
• RE: Re[2]: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Re[2]: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• RE: Re[2]: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Saturday, 20 February)

Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL

• RE: **Updated** WCAG Agenda March 15th, 2016 (Tuesday, 15 March)
• RE: Minutes of teleconference on WCAG Next Workshop 14 March 2016 (Monday, 14 March)
• RE: Re[2]: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Friday, 5 February)
• RE: Change to introductory paragraphs (Tuesday, 2 February)
• RE: IRC channel for Screenreader user questions (Tuesday, 2 February)
• RE: No WCAG meeting Tuesday (Tuesday, 2 February)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Friday, 29 January)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Friday, 29 January)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Friday, 29 January)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Wednesday, 13 January)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Wednesday, 13 January)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - markup-wise (Wednesday, 13 January)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - markup-wise (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Question on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers (Tuesday, 12 January)
• RE: CFC - Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Tuesday, 5 January)

Kenny Zhang

• Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)

Kurt Mattes

• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: Re[7]: Thoughts on pull request? (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)

Laura Carlson

• Reminder: Call for Review: Accessibility Requirements for People with Low Vision (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Monday, 28 March)
• WCAG WG Meeting Minutes March 8, 2016 (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: CfC: Publish updated Techniques and Understanding documents (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: [LVTF] Technique volunteers needed (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: [LVTF] Technique volunteers needed (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Change to introductory paragraphs (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Meeting Minutes January 19, 2015 (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: CfC: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Readability tests (Tuesday, 5 January)

lisa.seeman

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Ongoing editorial changes to the coga roadmaps (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: RE: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Monday, 4 January)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)

Léonie Watson

• RE: How to proceed on WCAG 2.next: design thinking exercise (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)

Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.

• Re: WCAG Agenda 29th March 2016 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: CfC: Publish updated Techniques and Understanding documents (Tuesday, 1 March)

Michael Cooper

• Fwd: Call for Review: Accessibility Requirements for People with Low Vision (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Changed links in WCAG Understanding / Techniques (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Changed links in WCAG Understanding / Techniques (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Daylight savings time will change meeting times the next couple weeks (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Review of Digital Publishing Accessibility Note http://w3c.github.io/dpub-accessibility/ (Wednesday, 24 February)
• WCAG FAQ (Thursday, 18 February)

Michael Pluke

• RE: Icon and Icon Fonts: New thread (Tuesday, 1 March)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Thursday, 11 February)
• RE: Re[5]: Thoughts on pull request? (Tuesday, 12 January)
• RE: Re[2]: Thoughts on pull request? (Tuesday, 12 January)

Mike Elledge

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Sunday, 27 March)
• Re: WCAG Agenda March 8th 2016 (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• WCAG Working Group Teleconference Minutes--February 23, 2016 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Issue 80 and F3 (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: Issue 80 and F3 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: WCAG Agenda January 12, 2016 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: Re[7]: Thoughts on pull request? (Tuesday, 12 January)

Moe Kraft

• Re: WCAG Agenda March 1st 2016 (Tuesday, 1 March)
• MINUTES: WCAG Agenda 16th February 2016 (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)

Neil Milliken

• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)

Paul J. Adam

• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)

Richards, Jan

• RE: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)

Sailesh Panchang

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Sunday, 27 March)
• Proposal to change Understanding SC 3.3.2 and related SC applicability (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Tuesday, 16 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Sunday, 14 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Should G83: "Providing text descriptions to identify required fields that were not completed" reference 3.3.2? (Wednesday, 10 February)
• Re: Re[2]: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Friday, 5 February)
• Re: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Thursday, 4 February)
• Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: CfC: Change to introductory paragraphs (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Re: Question on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: CfC: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Wednesday, 6 January)

Sarah Horton

• Re: WCAG Agenda 29th March 2016 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Change in focus for WCAG2.next workshop (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: How to proceed on WCAG 2.next: design thinking exercise (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: CfC: Change to introductory paragraphs (Tuesday, 2 February)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: CfC: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Tuesday, 5 January)
• Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Tuesday, 5 January)

Sarah Swierenga

• WCAG - March 15th 2016 (Tuesday, 8 March)
• RE: WCAG Agenda March 1st 2016 (Tuesday, 1 March)
• RE: Publish updated Techniques and Understanding documents (Friday, 26 February)
• RE: Change to introductory paragraphs (Wednesday, 3 February)
• Meeting minutes January 12 2016 (Tuesday, 12 January)
• RE: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Tuesday, 5 January)

Shadi Abou-Zahra

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Tuesday, 29 March)

Srinivasu Chakravarthula

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Sunday, 27 March)
• Re: CfC: Publish updated Techniques and Understanding documents (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: Thoughts on pull request? (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: CfC: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: Re[2]: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Monday, 4 January)

Steve Faulkner

• Re: Make it more obvious that older versions are out of date / obsolete (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Question on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers (Tuesday, 12 January)

Vivienne Conway

• RE: Make it more obvious that older versions are out of date / obsolete (Friday, 26 February)
• RE: Question on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers (Wednesday, 13 January)

Wayne Dick

• Re: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Sunday, 27 March)
• Re: Transient states (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: Drop advisory technique H46 (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Minutes for March 1 2015 WCAG WG (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Icon and Icon Fonts: New thread (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Icon and Icon Fonts: New thread (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: Color Contrast (was RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 - which has long since been lost in this thread) (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: WCAG Agenda March 1st 2016 (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: CfC: Publish updated Techniques and Understanding documents (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Icon Fonts and contrast (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: WCAG Agenda February 23, 2016 (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: WCAG Agenda January 19, 2016 (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: WCAG Agenda January 19, 2016 (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: Issue 80 and F3 (Thursday, 14 January)
• Issue 80 and F3 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• Re: WCAG Agenda 5th January 2016 (Monday, 4 January)

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker

• WCAG-ACTION-320: W to prepare mobile a11y wcag extension for wg review http://w3c.github.io/mobile-a11y-extension/ (Tuesday, 29 March)
• WCAG-ACTION-319: Work with john f, alastair, david and others to discuss ideas for how to proceed on wcag 2.next and report back on april 5 (Tuesday, 8 March)
• WCAG-ACTION-318: Horton to look at new technique for disappearing background images. (Tuesday, 12 January)

White, Jason J

• RE: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Monday, 28 March)
• RE: Proposal to get out of the techniques business on WCAG.NEXT (Sunday, 27 March)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Monday, 22 February)
• RE: Coming to a decision on 2.2 (Friday, 19 February)
• RE: Re[2]: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Friday, 5 February)
• RE: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Thursday, 4 February)
• RE: Comment / question re. Requirements for WCAG 2.0 Extensions (Thursday, 4 February)
• RE: Change to introductory paragraphs (Tuesday, 2 February)
• RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG (Monday, 1 February)
• Re: Question on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers (Tuesday, 12 January)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 March 2016 15:36:52 UTC