RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG

Ø  I would like to agree with you Jon, but the criteria does not support this as written.

Understood on the duplicate attributes and missing quotes – but I do wonder if incorrect ARIA roles could potentially be seen as causing the elements to not be nested according to the specification.

Jonathan

Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
SSB BART Group
jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com
703.637.8957 (o)
Follow us: Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/ssbbartgroup> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/#!/SSBBARTGroup> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/355266?trk=tyah> | Blog<http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/blog> | Newsletter<http://eepurl.com/O5DP>

From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:20 AM
To: Jonathan Avila
Cc: Alastair Campbell; David MacDonald; Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL; GLWAI Guidelines WG org
Subject: Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and How? - and SVG


On 1 February 2016 at 13:05, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com<mailto:jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>> wrote:
I absolutely agree, a misspelled ARIA attribute or value would be a violation under SC 4.1.1 in my opinion.

I would like to agree with you Jon, but the criteria does not support this as written.

--

Regards

SteveF
Current Standards Work @W3C<http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>

Received on Monday, 1 February 2016 13:26:20 UTC