- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:41:48 +0000
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VnX0gK4YZBLjXs8AwNmvHXMadV=cXsx6G7bpja5T=X8HA@mail.gmail.com>
*<div rol="navigation"> </div><div role="navigaton"> </div>* *checked with http://validator.w3.org/nu/#textarea <http://validator.w3.org/nu/#textarea>* *Error*: Attribute rol not allowed on element div <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/single-page.html#the-div-element> at this point. *Error*: Bad value navigaton for attribute role on element div <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/single-page.html#the-div-element> . -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> On 1 February 2016 at 14:31, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > I think it is cases like this that highlight the issue: > > <div rol=“navigation"> (attribute mis-spelling) > Or > <div role=“navigaton”> (value mis-spelling) > > I’m not even sure the second would be brought up as an HTML validation > error as HTML probably doesn’t have a pre-defined set of values, those are > defined in ARIA. > > A coding error, but not ones covered by 4.1.1. I think the effect would > found be under 4.1.2, but that doesn’t seem quite right. > > -Alastair > > > > From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> > Date: Monday, 1 February 2016 at 13:25 > To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> > Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, David MacDonald < > david100@sympatico.ca>, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, > GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > Subject: RE: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and > How? - and SVG > > Ø I would like to agree with you Jon, but the criteria does not support > this as written. > > > > Understood on the duplicate attributes and missing quotes – but I do > wonder if incorrect ARIA roles could potentially be seen as causing the > elements to not be nested according to the specification. > > > > Jonathan > > > > Jonathan Avila > > Chief Accessibility Officer > SSB BART Group > jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com > > 703.637.8957 (o) > Follow us: Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/#!/ssbbartgroup> | Twitter > <http://twitter.com/#!/SSBBARTGroup> | LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/company/355266?trk=tyah> | Blog > <http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/blog> | Newsletter <http://eepurl.com/O5DP> > > > > *From:* Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com > <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* Monday, February 01, 2016 8:20 AM > *To:* Jonathan Avila > *Cc:* Alastair Campbell; David MacDonald; Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL; GLWAI > Guidelines WG org > *Subject:* Re: Question #2 on 4.1.1 Parsing - what it covers - ARIA? and > How? - and SVG > > > > > > On 1 February 2016 at 13:05, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> > wrote: > > I absolutely agree, a misspelled ARIA attribute or value would be a > violation under SC 4.1.1 in my opinion. > > > > I would like to agree with you Jon, but the criteria does not support this > as written. > > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > > Current Standards Work @W3C > <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> >
Received on Monday, 1 February 2016 14:42:58 UTC