- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:04:31 +0000
- To: Srinivasu Chakravarthula <srinivasu.chakravarthula@deque.com>, "Paul J. Adam" <paul.adam@deque.com>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4B1FDEE7-A611-4F3E-97E0-020555C55170@adobe.com>
It looks like the label was added in response to the suggestion that there might be more than one navigation on a page and the label would help differentiate them for the user: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2015JulSep/0194.html I’m happy to remove it as I wouldn’t fail a page for not having the aria-label, and I’m happy keeping it as I also wouldn’t fail a page for using “breadcrumbs” or “location”. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility From: Srinivasu Chakravarthula <srinivasu.chakravarthula@deque.com<mailto:srinivasu.chakravarthula@deque.com>> Date: Monday, January 11, 2016 at 10:57 To: "paul.adam@deque.com<mailto:paul.adam@deque.com>" <paul.adam@deque.com<mailto:paul.adam@deque.com>> Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>> Subject: Re: Thoughts on pull request? Yes, if at all needed, using aria-labelledby would be a good idea. Thanks, Srini Best regards, Srinivasu Chakravarthula Sr. Accessibility Consultant, Deque<http://deque.com> Hand phone: +91 709 380 3855 Deque University<http://dequeuniversity.com> | Follow me on Twitter<http://twitter.com/CSrinivasu> | Connect on LinkedIn<http://linkedin.com/in/srinivasuc> | About Me<http://about.me/srinivasuc> Technology is a gift to everyone; let's create inclusive digital experience On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Paul J. Adam <paul.adam@deque.com<mailto:paul.adam@deque.com>> wrote: How about “Current Page” ? :) I do agree there’s no need for an aria-label or a better idea would be to use aria-labelledby and point to the ID of the “you are here” string. Paul J. Adam Accessibility Evangelist www.deque.com<http://www.deque.com> On Jan 11, 2016, at 9:39 AM, Srinivasu Chakravarthula <srinivasu.chakravarthula@deque.com<mailto:srinivasu.chakravarthula@deque.com>> wrote: Hello Andrew et al, I am not sure if there is a real need for a label here when there is already info stating "You are here" which is more meaningful than "breadcrumb" or "location". I agree with Josh that location in general means to a geographical location and that's what users would assume specially there is a lot of location use in apps today. So even "Current location" as suggested by my friend Paul would also be confusing. Sorry Paul... Thanks, Srini Best regards, Srinivasu Chakravarthula Sr. Accessibility Consultant, Deque<http://deque.com/> Hand phone: +91 709 380 3855 Deque University<http://dequeuniversity.com/> | Follow me on Twitter<http://twitter.com/CSrinivasu> | Connect on LinkedIn<http://linkedin.com/in/srinivasuc> | About Me<http://about.me/srinivasuc> Technology is a gift to everyone; let's create inclusive digital experience On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Paul J. Adam <paul.adam@deque.com<mailto:paul.adam@deque.com>> wrote: I would say something like “Current Location”. I don’t think that “Breadcrumbs” is a plain language term that non-developer folks know what it means in terms of a web site. Paul J. Adam Accessibility Evangelist www.deque.com<http://www.deque.com/> On Jan 11, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> wrote: I think that this may we be editorial, but what do people think – is “location” better than “breadcrumbs” in this example? https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/142/files?diff=split Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
Received on Monday, 11 January 2016 16:05:04 UTC