- From: <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:07:19 +0000
- To: "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 11 January 2016 14:06:38 UTC
I think breadcrumb may be better - as its a 'known' pattern (though as I type, its known the devs but maybe not to the public). I think location could be confusing, unless used in the context of GPS/real world navigation and mobile location services. Unless its clear its the location within the content, and not the location of the person looking at the content. bet you'll be sorry you asked ;-) Josh ------ Original Message ------ From: "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com> To: "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: 11/01/2016 13:58:40 Subject: Thoughts on pull request? >I think that this may we be editorial, but what do people think – is >“location” better than “breadcrumbs” in this example? > >https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/142/files?diff=split > >Thanks, >AWK > >Andrew Kirkpatrick >Group Product Manager, Accessibility >Adobe > >akirkpat@adobe.com >http://twitter.com/awkawk >http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
Received on Monday, 11 January 2016 14:06:38 UTC