Re: Thoughts on pull request?

Either way is fine with me too.

Kindest regards,
Laura

On 1/11/16, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
> It looks like the label was added in response to the suggestion that there
> might be more than one navigation on a page and the label would help
> differentiate them for the user:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2015JulSep/0194.html
>
> I’m happy to remove it as I wouldn’t fail a page for not having the
> aria-label, and I’m happy keeping it as I also wouldn’t fail a page for
> using “breadcrumbs” or “location”.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
>
> From: Srinivasu Chakravarthula
> <srinivasu.chakravarthula@deque.com<mailto:srinivasu.chakravarthula@deque.com>>
> Date: Monday, January 11, 2016 at 10:57
> To: "paul.adam@deque.com<mailto:paul.adam@deque.com>"
> <paul.adam@deque.com<mailto:paul.adam@deque.com>>
> Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>>, WCAG
> <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
> Subject: Re: Thoughts on pull request?
>
> Yes, if at all needed, using aria-labelledby would be a good idea.
> Thanks,
> Srini
>
> Best regards,
>
> Srinivasu Chakravarthula
> Sr. Accessibility Consultant, Deque<http://deque.com>
> Hand phone: +91 709 380 3855
>
> Deque University<http://dequeuniversity.com> | Follow me on
> Twitter<http://twitter.com/CSrinivasu> | Connect on
> LinkedIn<http://linkedin.com/in/srinivasuc> | About
> Me<http://about.me/srinivasuc>
>
> Technology is a gift to everyone; let's create inclusive digital experience
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Paul J. Adam
> <paul.adam@deque.com<mailto:paul.adam@deque.com>> wrote:
> How about “Current Page” ? :)
>
> I do agree there’s no need for an aria-label or a better idea would be to
> use aria-labelledby and point to the ID of the “you are here” string.
>
> Paul J. Adam
> Accessibility Evangelist
> www.deque.com<http://www.deque.com>
>
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 9:39 AM, Srinivasu Chakravarthula
> <srinivasu.chakravarthula@deque.com<mailto:srinivasu.chakravarthula@deque.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Andrew et al,
> I am not sure if there is a real need for a label here when there is already
> info stating "You are here" which is more meaningful than "breadcrumb" or
> "location".
>
> I agree with Josh that location in general means to a geographical location
> and that's what users would assume specially there is a lot of location use
> in apps today. So even "Current location" as suggested by my friend Paul
> would also be confusing. Sorry Paul...
>
> Thanks,
> Srini
>
> Best regards,
>
> Srinivasu Chakravarthula
> Sr. Accessibility Consultant, Deque<http://deque.com/>
> Hand phone: +91 709 380 3855
>
> Deque University<http://dequeuniversity.com/> | Follow me on
> Twitter<http://twitter.com/CSrinivasu> | Connect on
> LinkedIn<http://linkedin.com/in/srinivasuc> | About
> Me<http://about.me/srinivasuc>
>
> Technology is a gift to everyone; let's create inclusive digital experience
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Paul J. Adam
> <paul.adam@deque.com<mailto:paul.adam@deque.com>> wrote:
> I would say something like “Current Location”.
>
> I don’t think that “Breadcrumbs” is a plain language term that non-developer
> folks know what it means in terms of a web site.
>
> Paul J. Adam
> Accessibility Evangelist
> www.deque.com<http://www.deque.com/>
>
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick
> <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> wrote:
>
> I think that this may we be editorial, but what do people think – is
> “location” better than “breadcrumbs” in this example?
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/142/files?diff=split
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Monday, 11 January 2016 16:13:33 UTC