Re: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public review

+1 to release for public review.

Best regards,

*Srinivasu Chakravarthula*
Sr. Accessibility Consultant, *Deque* <http://deque.com>
Hand phone: +91 709 380 3855

Deque University <http://dequeuniversity.com> | Follow me on Twitter
<http://twitter.com/CSrinivasu> | Connect on LinkedIn
<http://linkedin.com/in/srinivasuc> | About Me <http://about.me/srinivasuc>

Technology is a gift to everyone; let's create inclusive digital experience

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> John,
> There is a smaller number of changes than on average, but more than you
> are seeing in the diff markup.
>
> You can see the commits and files changed here:
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/compare/Working-Branch-for-Q1-2016 – I’m not
> sure why the diff markup is not showing up for all of the changes.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
>
> From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
> Date: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 16:52
> To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Subject: RE: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public
> review
>
> Andrew, Josh,
>
>
>
> Attempting to view any differences in the Understanding document, I
> navigated to
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2016/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20160105/complete-diff.html
>
>
>
> Using the toggle switches provided in page, I do not see any changes or
> deletions, and only one addition “Partial conformance claims due to third
> party content” – should I be expecting to see any other changes in the Diff
> view?
>
>
>
> (Likewise for Techniques -
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2016/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20160105/complete-diff.html
> - which indicates only 2 additions, 3 changes, and no deletions – is this
> correct?)
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> JF
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com <akirkpat@adobe.com>]
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 5, 2016 12:31 PM
> *To:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* CfC: Publish Techniques and Understanding documents for public
> review
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday January 7 at 3:30pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> The group has collected responses to comments and issues over the past
> several months and intends to release the latest versions of the
> Understanding WCAG 2.0 and Techniques for WCAG 2.0 documents for public
> review.  During the review period we will collect comments and will have a
> chance to review and address them prior to releasing the documents as W3C
> Working Group Notes (and releasing the documents as Notes will also require
> a separate CfC).
>
>
>
> Understanding:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2016/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20160105/
>
> Techniques: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2016/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20160105/
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about releasing these documents for public comment
> that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in
> you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know
> before the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
> http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
>