public-xg-webid@w3.org from November 2011 by author

Andrei Sambra

• RE: Limit public keys and SAN entries? (was Re: Updated IdP to new spec.) (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. (Sunday, 27 November)
• Updated IdP to new spec. (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: WebID TLS (Saturday, 5 November)

Baptiste Lafontaine

• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)

bergi

• Re: test suite (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Apache configuration (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: WebID TLS (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods (Thursday, 3 November)

Dan Brickley

• Re: struggling with ASK (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: excellent diagram in spec (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: serialisation formats - Re: comments to references (Monday, 31 October)

Dominik Tomaszuk

• Re: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: updated spec with examples using new ontology (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: new spec in bblfish branch of mercurial repository (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: WebID ISSUE 61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: WebID ISSUE 61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Saturday, 19 November)
• Re: WebID TLS (Saturday, 5 November)
• cert:hex was Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Thursday, 3 November)

Dominique Guardiola

• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Tuesday, 15 November)

elf Pavlik

• Dec 12th/13th TERENA euroCAMP in Utrecht (Friday, 25 November)

Henry Story

• Re: test suite - does earl need a notion of a cause? (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: test suite (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: TLS-Light (Wednesday, 30 November)
• TLS-Light (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Securing the Next Generation of Web Apps - talk (Wednesday, 30 November)
• xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: excellent diagram in spec (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: excellent diagram in spec (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE 66 (microdata): Microdata Support [WebID Spec] (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Fediz IDP proposed for incubation at Apache (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] using windows to mint web id credentials, (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: foafssl.org converted - an example without SPARQL (Saturday, 26 November)
• foafssl.org converted - an example without SPARQL (Saturday, 26 November)
• Verifying the WebID Claim (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: ask and you shall be redirected (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-64 (redirects): Redirects [WebID Spec] (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-64 (redirects): Redirects [WebID Spec] (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• closed 9 issues (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: Apache configuration (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: Apache configuration (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: Apache configuration (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: ask and you shall be redirected (Thursday, 24 November)
• implementations -was: new WebID spec published (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: new WebID spec published (Thursday, 24 November)
• FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 28 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Thursday, 24 November)
• new WebID spec published (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: cert ontology updated (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: cert ontology updated (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: cert ontology updated (Wednesday, 23 November)
• cert ontology updated (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: updated spec with examples using new ontology (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• updated spec with examples using new ontology (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: rsa ontology (in cert namespace?) (Tuesday, 22 November)
• VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Monday, 21 November)
• rsa ontology in cert namespace (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] CGI::Auth::FOAF_SSL 1.002 (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Monday, 21 November)
• 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: new spec in bblfish branch of mercurial repository (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: new spec in bblfish branch of mercurial repository (Sunday, 20 November)
• new spec in bblfish branch of mercurial repository (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: new sequence diagram (Sunday, 20 November)
• new sequence diagram (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: WebID ISSUE 61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: WebID ISSUE 61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Sunday, 20 November)
• Test suites added to mercurial (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: implementors first impression notes on the spec (Friday, 18 November)
• Terminology (Friday, 18 November)
• FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: implementors first impression notes on the spec (Friday, 18 November)
• ISSUE-33: Add a reference to the X.509 spec in the references sections (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: henry and code (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• xsd datattypes - was: Monday 14 November, Weekly meeting (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Monday 14 November, Weekly meeting (Monday, 14 November)
• replaced cert:int with xsd:int (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: [OT] How secure is HTTPS today? (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Test Suite - Was: WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: WebID TLS (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture (Monday, 7 November)
• WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: close ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: WebID TLS (Sunday, 6 November)
• Another use case for DANE (Saturday, 5 November)
• WebID TLS (Saturday, 5 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods (Saturday, 5 November)
• Re: [http-auth] Fwd: [TLS] HTTPS client-certificate-authentication in browsers, (Friday, 4 November)
• Re: cert:hex was Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Thursday, 3 November)
• TLS renegotiation in Java bug (Wednesday, 2 November)
• Fwd: Web Cryptography Working Group Charter (Wednesday, 2 November)

Jeff Sayre

• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Monday, 21 November)
• Important Read on Internet Freedoms in the USA (Thursday, 17 November)

Joe Presbrey

• Re: [foaf-protocols] HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods (Saturday, 5 November)

Jürgen Jakobitsch

• Re: WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: WebID enabled PoolParty - was: ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: close ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture (Wednesday, 2 November)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: TLS-Light (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-66 (microdata): Microdata Support [WebID Spec] (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: using windows to mint web id credentials, (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: spec is good (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: using windows to mint web id credentials, (Saturday, 26 November)
• Re: using windows to mint web id credentials, (Saturday, 26 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Saturday, 26 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: ask and you shall be redirected (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: ask and you shall be redirected (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: ask and you shall be redirected (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: cert ontology updated (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: cert ontology updated (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook etc.. as WebID IdPs (Friday, 18 November)
• LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook etc.. as WebID IdPs (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: implementors first impression notes on the spec (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: implementors first impression notes on the spec (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] Terminology (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: henry and code (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: henry and code (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: [OT] How secure is HTTPS today? (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: [OT] How secure is HTTPS today? (Tuesday, 8 November)

Manu Sporny

• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: [foaf-protocols] HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods (Saturday, 5 November)
• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods (Friday, 4 November)
• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods (Wednesday, 2 November)

Martin Gaedke

• Re: struggling with ASK (Wednesday, 30 November)

Melvin Carvalho

• Re: cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: cert:hex was Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: WebID TLS (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: WebID TLS (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: cert:hex was Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Thursday, 3 November)
• Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Wednesday, 2 November)

Mischa Tuffield

• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)

Mo McRoberts

• Re: Normative vs Informative (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Updated IdP to new spec. (Tuesday, 29 November)
• RE: Normative vs Informative (Tuesday, 29 November)
• RE: Updated IdP to new spec. (Monday, 28 November)
• RE: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: using windows to mint web id credentials, (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-64 (redirects): Redirects [WebID Spec] (Sunday, 27 November)
• Re: using windows to mint web id credentials, (Saturday, 26 November)
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: cert:fingerprint ? (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Tuesday, 22 November)
• RE: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Tuesday, 22 November)
• RE: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Monday, 21 November)

Nathan

• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: cert:int -> xsd:nonNegativeInteger (Wednesday, 2 November)

Peter Williams

• RE: struggling with ASK (Wednesday, 30 November)
• RE: Securing the Next Generation of Web Apps - talk (Wednesday, 30 November)
• RE: TLS-Light (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• RE: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• excellent diagram in spec (Tuesday, 29 November)
• RE: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• RE: struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• dotnet implementation webid validation agent (doesnt work, yet) (Tuesday, 29 November)
• RE: Limit public keys and SAN entries? (was Re: Updated IdP to new spec.) (Tuesday, 29 November)
• struggling with ASK (Tuesday, 29 November)
• RE: Updated IdP to new spec. (Tuesday, 29 November)
• RE: Normative vs Informative (Monday, 28 November)
• RE: Updated IdP to new spec. (Sunday, 27 November)
• RE: Normative vs Informative (Sunday, 27 November)
• RE: using windows to mint web id credentials, (Sunday, 27 November)
• spec is good (Sunday, 27 November)
• RE: using windows to mint web id credentials, (Saturday, 26 November)
• using windows to mint web id credentials, (Saturday, 26 November)
• RE: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• RE: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• RE: WebID-ISSUE-64 (redirects): Redirects [WebID Spec] (Friday, 25 November)
• RE: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• RE: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• ask and you shall be redirected (Thursday, 24 November)
• RE: new WebID spec published (Thursday, 24 November)
• RE: new WebID spec published (Thursday, 24 November)
• RE: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Wednesday, 23 November)
• RE: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Wednesday, 23 November)
• RE: cert ontology updated (Wednesday, 23 November)
• RE: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook etc.. as WebID IdPs (Friday, 18 November)
• RE: henry and code (Thursday, 17 November)
• RE: implementors first impression notes on the spec (Thursday, 17 November)
• implementors first impression notes on the spec (Thursday, 17 November)
• RE: henry and code (Thursday, 17 November)
• RE: henry and code (Thursday, 17 November)
• henry and code (Thursday, 17 November)
• RE: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Monday, 14 November)
• long term webid of peter, contrary to rumour (Sunday, 13 November)
• RE: WebID TLS (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: WebID TLS (Monday, 7 November)
• RE: WebID TLS (Sunday, 6 November)
• RE: [foaf-protocols] HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods (Saturday, 5 November)
• Re: [foaf-protocols] HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods (Saturday, 5 November)
• Re: [http-auth] Fwd: [TLS] HTTPS client-certificate-authentication in browsers, (Friday, 4 November)

Sebastian Tramp

• Re: [foaf-protocols] new sequence diagram (Sunday, 20 November)

Sergio Fernández

• Re: Apache configuration (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Apache configuration (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: Apache configuration (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Monday, 21 November)
• [OT] How secure is HTTPS today? (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: WebID TLS (Monday, 7 November)

Stéphane Corlosquet

• Re: WebID-ISSUE-66 (microdata): Microdata Support [WebID Spec] (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-66 (microdata): Microdata Support [WebID Spec] (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Limit public keys and SAN entries? (was Re: Updated IdP to new spec.) (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: VOTE CONCLUSION - was: 2 resolutions, please vote (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: 2 resolutions, please vote == Re: FORMAL WebID Teleconf, Monday 21 November 2011 -- 15:00UTC (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: WebID TLS (Saturday, 5 November)

Tim Berners-Lee

• include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace (Tuesday, 22 November)

Toby Inkster

• CGI::Auth::FOAF_SSL 1.002 (Monday, 21 November)

WebID Incubator Group Issue Tracker

• WebID-ISSUE-66 (microdata): Microdata Support [WebID Spec] (Tuesday, 29 November)
• WebID-ISSUE-65 (attack_scenarios): Add an Attack Scenarios section to the spec [WebID Spec] (Friday, 25 November)
• WebID-ISSUE-64 (redirects): Redirects [WebID Spec] (Friday, 25 November)
• WebID-ISSUE-63 (wikier): Explain on the wiki how to configure WebID on Apache Tomcat [WebID wiki] (Friday, 25 November)
• WebID-ISSUE-62 (certificate_authorities): null certificate_authorities list (Friday, 18 November)
• WebID-ISSUE-61 (xsd): xsd datatypes [ontologies] (Wednesday, 16 November)

Yutaka OIWA

• Re: HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods (Thursday, 3 November)

远洋

• Re: [foaf-protocols] Fediz IDP proposed for incubation at Apache (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Fediz IDP proposed for incubation at Apache (Tuesday, 29 November)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 November 2011 22:39:39 UTC