- From: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:45:49 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>, "julian.reschke@greenbytes.de" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>, "fielding@gbiv.com" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org" <foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org>, "public-xg-webid@w3.org" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
So what is webid vs webid-tls? Does webid tls exclude ssl v3? I ask as only very specific agendas call for the elimination of ssl v3. Only .001% of the users know the difference, and less than half of those can accurately state it. On Nov 4, 2011, at 2:28 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > On 04/11/2011, at 9:34 AM, bergi wrote: >> >> Authentication Scheme >> >> I was thinking about this a little bit more and now I'm not sure if we >> should use WebID or WebID-TLS or even something else. From the >> terminology point of view WebID-TLS would fit better. >> >> HTTPBis, part 7, section 2.3 [1] points to a link on the IANA web site >> which is dead [2]. I haven't found a new URL. Somebody knows if this >> page has moved somewhere else? > > That link is dead because HTTPbis hasn't been through the entire process yet; the IANA registries will be established later on. > > Cheers, > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > foaf-protocols mailing list > foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
Received on Saturday, 5 November 2011 01:49:03 UTC