- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:11:14 +0000
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- CC: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>, WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Melvin Carvalho wrote: > On 28 October 2011 12:45, Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl> wrote: >> I propose remove cert:int datatype from the Cert Ontology and change >> examples in section 2.3 in WebID spec. >> rsa:public_exponent is always integer >= 0. There is no need to duplicate >> this datatype. >> I know that is the argument that cert:int is more flexible writing than >> xsd:nonNegativeInteger, because it allows white space. But I think that >> freedom is dangerous, because it is harder to process " 6 5 5 3 7 >> "^^cert:int then "65537"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger. I think parsers should >> expect here normal number in base 10 notation. > > Along the lines of this simplification what about: > > cert:hex -> xsd:string ? > > If anyone thinks this has merit, I'll open up a new thread... Yes, or xsd:hexBinary
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2011 23:18:40 UTC