- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:30:08 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
On 25 October 2011 20:53, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 10/25/11 12:38 PM, Henry Story wrote: >> >> On 25 Oct 2011, at 18:33, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> >>> Henry, >>> >>> Since we have cert:key, what about cert:fingerprint? >> >> How would you define it? > > Good question since WOT [1] and these newer Key oriented ontologies aren't > aligned. In addition, WOT is conflating public key and x.509 certificate. WOT is under-documented, and any progression path will be via merging things into FOAF or these other vocabs. But I don't believe it conflates; rather we only handled the PGP use case, didn't get into x.509 at all. Dan
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 17:30:36 UTC