- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:31:05 +0100
- To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Cc: public-xg-webid@w3.org, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
On 3 November 2011 10:57, Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl> wrote:
> On 03.11.2011 00:11, Nathan wrote:
>>
>> Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>>
>>> Along the lines of this simplification what about:
>>>
>>> cert:hex -> xsd:string ?
>>>
>>> If anyone thinks this has merit, I'll open up a new thread...
>>
>> Yes, or xsd:hexBinary
>
> I proposed xsd:hexBinary, but Henry say that it is unreadable.
>
> My another proposal is to use xsd:string with owl:withRestriction and
> xsd:pattern (something like [0-9a-fA-F]{2}[[:space:]]).
>
> So we have:
> 1. xsd:string
> 2. xsd:string with restriction [0-9a-fA-F]{2}
> 3. xsd:hexBinary
+1 in general
dont mind too much which one of these would be used...
>
> Best,
> Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk
>
>
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 12:54:11 UTC