W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > November 2011

Re: close ISSUE-40: A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 17:59:43 +0100
Cc: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, Andreas Blumauer <a.blumauer@semantic-web.at>, Helmut Nagy <h.nagy@semantic-web.at>
Message-Id: <7C3CEBA5-C729-4197-BD6D-C79E3F7B862E@bblfish.net>
To: Jürgen Jakobitsch <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at>
Hi Jürgen, 

	thanks for all the good work here.   I have added you to the team, which is what really counts

I'll respond to the PoolParty piece in the next mail.

On 2 Nov 2011, at 11:38, Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:

> hi team#we, henry
> i have put together some answers and suggestions which you find below.
> henry :
> To report back in a couple of weeks. You don't seem to be an official member of the XG - if you want just ask for it - so I put it down as an action for me. But I can add you to the team for sure. Just send me your webid.
> JJ :
> i'd really like to become an official member of the XG on behalf of our company (for contact information see my mail-signature at the very bottom)

I think you need to go through the lightweight process described on the Incubator home page.


But being part of the foaf team is what really counts. 

> it also would be nice if you added me to the team#we (webID : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard)

Looks like you are naming yourself after your document. Would it perhaps be better to avoid later confusions to give yourself
a name such as the above URL followed by #me ?
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 17:00:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:48 UTC