- From: Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:56:10 +0000
- To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Cc: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 23 Nov 2011, at 11:00, Dominik Tomaszuk wrote: > In buttom of section 2.4.2 there is: > "If a WebID provider would rather prefer not to mark up his data in RDFa, but just provide a human readable format for users and have the RDF graph appear in a machine readable format such as RDF/XML then he may publish the link from the HTML to a machine readable format (it this is available at a dedicated URI) as follows: > > <html> > <head> > <link type="rel" type="application/rdf+xml" href="profile.rdf"/> > </head> > <body> ... </body> > </html> > " > > My comments: > 1) 'type="rel" type="application/rdf+xml"' is not valid, it should be: > rel="meta" type="application/rdf+xml" rel="meta", not rel="alternate"? (we are talking about an HTML page containing a human-readable representation of the same information, right?) -- Mo McRoberts - Technical Lead - The Space, 0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E, Project Office: Room 7083, BBC Television Centre, London W12 7RJ
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 11:56:40 UTC