Re: [foaf-protocols] HTTP request header field for acceptable authentication methods

Not sure why you're asking me; perhaps the cc list needs to be trimmed? 

On 05/11/2011, at 12:45 PM, Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com> wrote:

> So what is webid vs webid-tls?
> 
> Does webid tls exclude ssl v3?
> 
> I ask as only very specific agendas call for the elimination of ssl v3. Only .001%  of the users know the difference, and less than half of those can accurately state it.
> 
> 
> On Nov 4, 2011, at 2:28 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 04/11/2011, at 9:34 AM, bergi wrote:
>>> 
>>> Authentication Scheme
>>> 
>>> I was thinking about this a little bit more and now I'm not sure if we
>>> should use WebID or WebID-TLS or even something else. From the
>>> terminology point of view WebID-TLS would fit better.
>>> 
>>> HTTPBis, part 7, section 2.3 [1] points to a link on the IANA web site
>>> which is dead [2]. I haven't found a new URL. Somebody knows if this
>>> page has moved somewhere else?
>> 
>> That link is dead because HTTPbis hasn't been through the entire process yet; the IANA registries will be established later on.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> foaf-protocols mailing list
>> foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
>> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols

Received on Saturday, 5 November 2011 01:56:11 UTC