Re: include privat ekeys Re: rsa ontology in cert namespace

On 11/23/11 1:39 PM, Henry Story wrote:
> The private key is there now:
>    http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert
>
> there is a private key class and a private_exponent to match the public one.
>
> Henry
>
> On 23 Nov 2011, at 19:24, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
>
>> On 2011-11 -22, at 04:51, Mo McRoberts wrote:
>>> In RSA, the modulus and exponent tend to be called 'n' and 'e', respectively, but some variant on 'modulus' and 'exponent' are fine *if* you ony want to store public keys (if you want to cover private keys -- though I'm not sure why you would -[...]
>> If you are making an ontology for keys, I feel it should include private keys. Be complete.
>> There is a lot of call for standards for private data, as well as public.
>> There is W3C work on management of credentials.
>> I might want also to do things like use RDF as an intermediate form
>> in converting identities between SSL and SSH worlds for example.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>
>
Henry,

I've added the rdfs:isDefinedBy triples to an updated version of this 
ontology in a data space I have control over. See:
http://uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fns%2Fauth%2Fcert%23 
.

You always have the option to emulate :-)

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen