- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:48:12 +0100
- To: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>
- Cc: <danbri@danbri.org>, "public-xg-webid@w3.org" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D5D4854B-1F34-481B-97D9-3279B0541519@bblfish.net>
On 25 Nov 2011, at 14:38, Peter Williams wrote: > > Thanks. > > my question is really simple: is http://yorkporc.blogspot.com/2011/11/bob.html#me a valid webid profile? It seems ok to me. It passes http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/ which returns the following n3 when I enter your webid above Can I add that URL to the team members list? :-) > > I though the WHOLE point of our adoption RDFa was that a fragment of suitably marked up div (cut and pasted, per a previous poster) could be inserted in any old (dirty) XHTML, tagged with the correct doctype? It was rather ambiguous whether the doctype was even really required, though. > > This property was supposed to differentiate it from the previous approaches, produced by machines in some serialization format produced in an endpoint - little different to any other for the last 30 years. > > if it is, following up the usual insults from our W3C chair, ill make a blog post with my own certs/keys - rather than use the values from the spec. > > (I just used the spec values so there was nothing to object to ...in raw conformance terms ... while I found a publishing platform that works and could be tested against the test suite and the 14 other implementations, as they adopt the new spec over the next month) > > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:49:06 +0100 > > From: danbri@danbri.org > > To: home_pw@msn.com > > CC: public-xg-webid@w3.org > > Subject: Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa? > > > > [snip] > > > > Re dirty HTML, this is a very real issue. HTML documents are usually > > pretty crappy, standards-wise. > > > > I'd suggest looking into HTML5's approach. They have a much more > > liberal parsing regime than XML (this was one of the major drivers for > > the original WHATWG/XHTML fork). > > > > So http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/parsing.html#parsing and nearby define > > ways of turning ugly worldy documents into a parsed structure. There's > > a parser at http://code.google.com/p/html5lib/ or > > http://about.validator.nu/htmlparser/ > > > > See also http://ejohn.org/blog/html-5-parsing/ > > > > cheers, > > > > Dan > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
Received on Friday, 25 November 2011 13:48:54 UTC