W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > November 2011

Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:43:52 +0100
Cc: public-xg-webid@w3.org
Message-Id: <4A27A172-3225-4360-BA74-B6CAD128B59F@bblfish.net>
To: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>

On 23 Nov 2011, at 15:39, Henry Story wrote:

>> Note, that the webid validation protocol has no "discovery" elements of procedure for the validation agent to follow, today (and no security model for discovery, either). If an alternate link  points to another HTML document (with further links) what does one do?
> It does: deference the URL - that' s the discovery bit. Where others have all kinds of layers we do it one go. That's because we build up recursively on URIs, and well in particular on URLs.

Mhh, I just noticed that our title was "WebID 1.0: Identification and Discovery"

So I see that people may be looking for discovery.... Not sure why that's in the title... Perhaps WebID 1.0 is enough.


Social Web Architect

Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 15:44:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:48 UTC