- From: Mischa Tuffield <mischa@mmt.me.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:56:50 +0000
- To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Cc: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <9A24EA31-C6D5-4DF0-A27A-CE0DB4489623@mmt.me.uk>
Hi All, Apologies if I am butting into this conversation and someone else has already mentioned this but : <snip/> > 2) I think we should also provide embeded Turtle. Now in Turtle draft it is possible to do it in <script> element [1]: > <script type="text/turtle"> > @prefix : <http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#> . > @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . > @prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> . > @prefix bob: <https://bob.example/profile#> . > > bob:me a foaf:Person; > foaf:name "Joe"; > :key [ a :RSAPublicKey; > :modulus "00cb24ed85d64..."^^xsd:hexBinary; > :exponent 65537 ; > ] . > </script> > or > <script type="text/turtle" src="profile.ttl"></script> > > > [1] Section Turtle in HTML and/or XHTML https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html You are citing a random version of an Editor's Draft from a dcvs repository in [1], my bet is that this wont get into the standard, but I could be wrong on this one. Your link [1] states in red "Editor's Draft", the current published version can be found on : http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/. Given that the thing you cite is a random Editor's Draft, you can have no assurances at all that it will be in the final draft of Turtle, when it gets standardised later next year. Personally, I would stay clear of the above method. Warmest Regards, Mischa > > Best regards, > Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk > _________________________________ Mischa Tuffield Email: mischa@mmt.me.uk Homepage: http://mmt.me.uk/ WebID: http://mmt.me.uk/foaf.rdf#mischa
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 14:57:21 UTC