public-webapps-github@w3.org from September 2017 by author

Abdón Rodríguez Davila

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support for pseudo elements with ::slotted() selectors (#655) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support for pseudo elements with ::slotted() selectors (#655) (Tuesday, 26 September)

achristensen07

• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Friday, 15 September)

Adam Rice

• [whatwg/streams] Add and remove local variables (#814) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] TransformStream backpressure test (#569) (Thursday, 28 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Should Content-Type header be stripped when redirecting from POST to GET? (#609) (Thursday, 28 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Rename abstract operations (#812) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• [whatwg/streams] WIP: Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Change the default highWaterMark for readableStrategy to 0 (#808) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Remove the _readableController and _writableController slots (#810) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Add some extra asserts to TransformStream to clarify invariants (#809) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Change the default highWaterMark for readableStrategy to 0 (#808) (Monday, 25 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Change the default highWaterMark for readableStrategy to 0 (#808) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Rename "transformStream" variables to "stream" (#805) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Rename "transformStream" variables to "stream" (#805) (Monday, 25 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Some assert()s have no description (#807) (Friday, 22 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Fix access to removed _errored and _storedError slots (#806) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Detect if the TransformStream errored inside write() and reject (#799) (Friday, 22 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Rename "transformStream" variables to "stream" (#805) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] What should the behaviour of controller.close() be? (#774) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] What should the behaviour of controller.close() be? (#774) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] What should the behaviour of controller.close() be? (#774) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: remove [[errored]] and [[storedError]] slots (#796) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove _errored and _storedError from TransformStream (#800) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove _errored and _storedError from TransformStream (#800) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove _errored and _storedError from TransformStream (#800) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove _errored and _storedError from TransformStream (#800) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Detect if the TransformStream errored inside write() and reject (#799) (Friday, 22 September)
• [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: use throw instead of Promise.reject() in promise handlers (#804) (Friday, 22 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Include "erroring" in the list of states for WritableStream (#803) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Calling close() on TransformStreamDefaultController should relieve backpressure (#774) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Reorganise TransformStream slots and abstract operations (#776) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: test that start() is called exactly once (#802) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Reorganise TransformStream slots and abstract operations (#776) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] TransformStream backpressure test (#569) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Remove assertion that RSDefaultControllerClose doesn't throw (#801) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Use some logging framework (#499) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Remove _errored and _storedError from TransformStream (#800) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Detect if the TransformStream errored inside write() and reject (#799) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: test enqueue(), close(), error() in bad states (#793) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: test enqueue(), close(), error() in bad states (#793) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: test enqueue(), close(), error() in bad states (#793) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: remove [[errored]] and [[storedError]] slots (#796) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] reader.read() inside strategy.size() doesn't work (#794) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Tie the model to the API for pipe chains (#798) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Don't be dismissive about the controller/stream division (#797) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Don't be dismissive about the controller/stream division (#797) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] "At this point in time the division of work betw..." (#741) (Friday, 15 September)
• [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: remove [[errored]] and [[storedError]] slots (#796) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Clarify some of the ECMAScript conventions applied (#790) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] reader.read() inside strategy.size() doesn't work (#794) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Monday, 11 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Monday, 11 September)
• [whatwg/streams] reader.read() inside strategy.size() doesn't work (#794) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add explicit tests of the strategy arguments to TransformStream (#770) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add explicit tests of the strategy arguments to TransformStream (#770) (Friday, 8 September)
• [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: test enqueue(), close(), error() in bad states (#793) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream's writableDone member (#789) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Link [[CancelSteps]] and [[PullSteps]] (#758) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Editorial: explain and link [[CancelSteps]]/[[PullSteps]] (#791) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Editorial: explain and link [[CancelSteps]]/[[PullSteps]] (#791) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Update acknowledgments and editorship (#792) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Clarify some of the ECMAScript conventions applied (#790) (Friday, 8 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream's writableDone member (#789) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add brand check to ReadableStreamBYOBRequest constructor (#787) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] "Set this.[[associatedReadableByteStreamControll..." (#780) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add brand check to ReadableStreamBYOBRequest constructor (#787) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _transforming member (#788) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Permit any pending writes to complete on error (#785) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Permit any pending writes to complete on error (#785) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add brand check to ReadableStreamBYBORequest constructor (#787) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket: "HTTP authentication will not function" is not correct (#565) (Monday, 4 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Add brand check to ReadableStreamBYBORequest constructor (#787) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] "Set this.[[associatedReadableByteStreamControll..." (#780) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Change default readableStrategy HWM to 0? (#777) (Friday, 1 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Permit closing the writable to close the readable, even with HWM 0 (#786) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Change default readableStrategy HWM to 0? (#777) (Friday, 1 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Permit any pending writes to complete on error (#785) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Friday, 1 September)

Aleksandar Totic

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for ResizeObserver (#187) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for ResizeObserver (#187) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for ResizeObserver (#187) (Thursday, 14 September)

Alex Russell

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Modeling media auto-playing as a permission? (#203) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Device Memory API (#190) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for ResizeObserver (#187) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web payment method manifest (#162) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] ads.txt (#201) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)

Andrea Giammarchi

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element - untrackable upgrade (#671) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element - untrackable upgrade (#671) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element - untrackable upgrade (#671) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element - untrackable upgrade (#671) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element - untrackable upgrade (#671) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element - untrackable upgrade (#671) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Andrea Marchesini

• [w3c/ServiceWorker] messageerror event should use ExtendableMessageEvent (#1193) (Tuesday, 12 September)

Andrew Betts

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for review: Preload (#202) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for review: Preload (#202) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for review: Preload (#202) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for review: Preload (#202) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request to review Image Decode API (#182) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request review for PauseFrame API (#196) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of signature-based resource loading restrictions. (#186) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of signature-based resource loading restrictions. (#186) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request to review Image Decode API (#182) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request to review Image Decode API (#182) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Clear Site Data (#62) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Tuesday, 5 September)

Andy Earnshaw

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] shadow tree -> iframe <- contentWindow.frameElement encapsulation issue (#507) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix 515: Expose Event, EventTarget to AudioWorklet (#516) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Expose Event, EventTarget to AudioWorklet (#515) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] History behind the decision to make fetch return a Promise (#611) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] History behind the decision to make fetch return a Promise (#611) (Friday, 29 September)
• [whatwg/xhr] Use Infra for JSON parsing (#153) (Friday, 29 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Use Infra for JSON parsing (#610) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Expose Event, EventTarget to AudioWorklet (#515) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request ever be a range request if we cannot verify if the underlying resource is the same? (#1201) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] A more modest request() (#158) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Missing legacy encodings (#123) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Missing legacy encodings (#123) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] It shouldn't be possible for objects that implement non-exposed interfaces to appear in the environment (#449) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Don't update FileReader's result until "LOAD" (#79) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] What is the expected interaction of [SecureContext] with mixins? (#118) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Clarify the expectation if pushState() data is covered by Storage Standard (#50) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Don't update FileReader's result until "LOAD" (#79) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for WebVR (#185) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Serialization of natural language in data formats such as JSON [I18N] (#178) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should Content-Type header be stripped when redirecting from POST to GET? (#609) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should Content-Type header be stripped when redirecting from POST to GET? (#609) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Cloned responses should not have immutable headers (#608) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Cloned responses should not have immutable headers (#608) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request to review Image Decode API (#182) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Don't update FileReader's result until "LOAD" (#79) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Disallow dialog.requestFullscreen() (#104) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Cloned responses should not have immutable headers (#608) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Disallow dialog.requestFullscreen() (#104) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request to review Image Decode API (#182) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Example should check for current aborted state (#514) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] index (#122) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Mention of StructuredClone (#78) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Implementations allow all values in type getter (#43) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Implementations allow all values in type getter (#43) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Mention of StructuredClone (#78) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Remove FileList (Migrate to | typedef FileList FrozenArray<File>; | (#19) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Remove FileList (Migrate to | typedef FileList FrozenArray<File>; | (#19) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Attempting to modify a fetch after it has completed / aborted / failed (#448) (Sunday, 24 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Attempting to modify a fetch after it has completed / aborted / failed (#448) (Sunday, 24 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] A more modest request() (#158) (Sunday, 24 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] FetchObserver (for a single fetch) (#607) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Attempting to modify a fetch after it has completed / aborted / failed (#448) (Friday, 22 September)
• [w3c/permissions] A more modest request() (#158) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] ReadableStream IDL type (#445) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] element.closest(selector, container) (#162) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#87) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Fetch abort & no-cors requests (#563) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• [heycam/webidl] ReadableStream IDL type (#445) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] CORS preflights need a service-workers mode of "none" (#598) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should CORS preflight fetch also copy request's service-workers mode? (#558) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] CORS preflights need a service-workers mode of "none" (#598) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] CORS preflights need a service-workers mode of "none" (#598) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Ability to detect CORS failures vs connection failures (#605) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] CORS preflights need a service-workers mode of "none" (#598) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Ability to detect CORS failures vs connection failures (#605) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Odd format for fetch callbacks (#536) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request's total bytes isn't set (#604) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Monday, 18 September)
• [whatwg/storage] Adopt "parallel queue" (#49) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Drive letters get duplicated when resolving Windows file: URL with base (#303) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] remaining variable ambiguity (#308) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Method for detecting finally-distributed nodes. (#611) (Monday, 18 September)
• [w3c/gamepad] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#63) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Friday, 15 September)
• [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#31) (Friday, 15 September)
• [w3c/clipboard-apis] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#54) (Friday, 15 September)
• [w3c/screen-orientation] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#106) (Friday, 15 September)
• [w3c/touch-events] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#87) (Friday, 15 September)
• [w3c/uievents] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#159) (Friday, 15 September)
• [w3c/selection-api] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#92) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Set event.target to null when dispatching finishes at ShadowRoot (#513) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] 📝 Editorial: add missing 'if' (#512) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] 📝 Editorial: add missing 'if' (#512) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] 📝 Editorial: add missing 'if' (#512) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "Otherwise, localName is associated attribute’s ..." (#508) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] 📝 Editorial: add missing 'if' (#512) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] 📝 Editorial: add missing 'if' (#512) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1188) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "foreign" service-workers mode (#596) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Event.target should return null after dispatch is complete, when stopped at ShadowRoot (#511) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] 📝 Fix #508 Grammatical error with missing 'if' (#512) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Standardize extension to content type mapping? (#51) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "foreign" service-workers mode (#596) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make fetch() use "same-origin" credentials by default (#585) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "serviceworker" from RequestDestination (#603) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "serviceworker" from RequestDestination (#603) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "serviceworker" in the RequestDestination enum (#602) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove legacy callers (#412) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove legacy callers (#412) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [[Call]] for objects w/o legacycaller (#408) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [[Construct]] for legacy platform objects? (#407) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "serviceworker" in the RequestDestination enum (#602) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Header to opt out of opaque redirect (#601) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Header to opt out of opaque redirect (#601) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Header to opt out of opaque redirect (#601) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Informative document cited as normative reference (#438) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clarify clipboardData's interaction with the Drag Data Store (#50) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Move EventHandler to DOM spec (#509) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Informative document cited as normative reference (#438) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Move EventHandler to DOM spec (#509) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Typography: IDL true and false (#437) (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Web compat implications of making getAllResponseHeaders lowercase (#146) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Web compat implications of making getAllResponseHeaders lowercase (#146) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Meta: Use OrdinarySetWithOwnDescriptor (#435) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Meta: Use OrdinarySetWithOwnDescriptor (#435) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Which standard defines :defined (#665) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstreaming Custom Elements and Outstanding v1 (#664) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Use OrdinarySet instead of [[Set]] (#201) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove legacy callers (#412) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Which standard defines :defined (#665) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Which standard defines :defined (#665) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstreaming Custom Elements and Outstanding v1 (#664) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstreaming Shadow DOM and outstanding v1 work (#661) (Thursday, 7 September)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Which standard defines :defined (#665) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstreaming Shadow DOM and outstanding v1 work (#661) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Access-Control-Expose-Headers: * can be interpreted in two ways (#548) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Access-Control-Expose-Headers: * can be interpreted in two ways (#548) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response `statusText` is ambiguous and unclear for HTTP/2 (#599) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response `statusText` is ambiguous and unclear for HTTP/2 (#599) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make status message default the empty byte sequence (#600) (Thursday, 7 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Make status message default the empty byte sequence (#600) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request review of Keyboard Lock (#192) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Method for detecting finally-distributed nodes. (#611) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response `statusText` is ambiguous and unclear for HTTP/2 (#599) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Travis build is always broken and seems completely useless (#407) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider defining inertness in terms of the composed tree (#653) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider defining inertness in terms of the composed tree (#653) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add [Exposed=Window] to MutationObserver (#507) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• [whatwg/dom] Add [Exposed=Window] to MutationObserver (#507) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow custom `input` element content (#659) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow custom `input` element content (#659) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM: Consider defining inertness in terms of the composed tree (bugzilla: 24379) (#653) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Agenda for W3C TPAC 2017 (Web Components) (#641) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should <link> work inside Shadow DOM? (#628) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should <link> work inside Shadow DOM? (#628) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow dom innerhtml and CSP unsafe-inline (#627) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow dom innerhtml and CSP unsafe-inline (#627) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Further upgrade of custom elements (#620) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Further upgrade of custom elements (#620) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] CE reaction queue's not-really-sync behavior doesn't provide strong enough guarantees about when reactions occur (#616) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] CE reaction queue's not-really-sync behavior doesn't provide strong enough guarantees about when reactions occur (#616) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defining and instantiating customized built‐in elements as if they were autonomous custom elements (#613) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] defining and instantiating customized built‐in elements as if they were autonomous custom elements (#613) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Method for detecting finally-distributed nodes. (#611) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Method for detecting finally-distributed nodes. (#611) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add an assignedElements() method (#602) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow customizing base of a shadow root (#581) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Travis build is always broken and seems completely useless (#407) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Improve the accessibility of SVG files which are used in the spec (#341) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Synthetic click activation steps should state whether the event is composed or not (#578) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Editorial: remove "rethrow" per Infra (#595) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Add a neato informative table of various URL pieces (#337) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 Status Code (#497) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Browsers preserve fragments on redirects (#505) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Get multiple headers as an aray rather than a combined value? (#506) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Get multiple headers as an aray rather than a combined value? (#506) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#517) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Fetching with a particular destination (#521) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response filter escalation (#535) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response filter escalation (#535) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] CORS preflights need a service-workers mode of "none" (#598) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "foreign" service-workers mode (#596) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "foreign" service-workers mode (#596) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Add a neato informative table of various URL pieces (#337) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• [w3c/touch-events] "List of TouchEvent types" Default Action (#86) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• [w3c/touch-events] "List of TouchEvent types" Async/Sync (#85) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] "List of TouchEvent types" contains requirements (#84) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstreaming Shadow DOM and outstanding v1 work (#661) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Umbrella bugs for shadow DOM related issues in other specifications for v1 API (#495) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Umbrella bugs for shadow DOM related issues in other specifications for v1 API (#495) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Upstreaming Shadow DOM and outstanding v1 work (#661) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• [w3c/uievents] Define retargeting steps (#157) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• [w3c/touch-events] "List of TouchEvent types" contains requirements (#84) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should <link> work inside Shadow DOM? (#628) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Add a neato informative table of various URL pieces (#337) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add `Last-Event-ID` as CORS-safelisted request-header (#597) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Add `Last-Event-ID` as CORS-safelisted request-header (#597) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Safelist Last-Event-ID (#568) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Safelist Last-Event-ID (#568) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "foreign" service-workers mode (#596) (Monday, 4 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Remove "foreign" service-workers mode (#596) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Only in Chrome (Service Worker): '... a redirected response was used for a request whose redirect mode is not "follow" ' (#573) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Only in Chrome (Service Worker): '... a redirected response was used for a request whose redirect mode is not "follow" ' (#573) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow a ReadableByteStream in `fetch({body: <body>})` (#577) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow a ReadableByteStream in `fetch({body: <body>})` (#577) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Can't reuse custom element constructors? (#618) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] customElements.define should throw on registration of definitions that shadow built-in properties / methods. (#583) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] customElements.define should throw on registration of definitions that shadow built-in properties / methods. (#583) (Monday, 4 September)
• [whatwg/dom] Add [CEReactions] to createElement() (#506) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Synthetic click activation steps should state whether the event is composed or not (#578) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Synthetic click activation steps should state whether the event is composed or not (#578) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Synthetic click activation steps should state whether the event is composed or not (#578) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM, <style>, and document.styleSheets (#56) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM, <style>, and document.styleSheets (#56) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] shadow tree -> iframe <- contentWindow.frameElement encapsulation issue (#507) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] shadow tree -> iframe <- contentWindow.frameElement encapsulation issue (#507) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should <link> work inside Shadow DOM? (#628) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Reinvestigate redirects to data URLs (#393) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Reinvestigate redirects to data URLs (#393) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] should Response.blob() type include parameters like charset? (#540) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "Extract a MIME type" algorithm should pick the first entry? (#529) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] How can I create a response with redirected: true (#552) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] How can I create a response with redirected: true (#552) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket: "HTTP authentication will not function" is not correct (#565) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket: "HTTP authentication will not function" is not correct (#565) (Monday, 4 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Editorial: remove "rethrow" per Infra (#595) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Constructing a Headers from another Headers is lossy (#481) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Regression: make Request constructor account for changes to fill (#484) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Type confusion in Request constructor leading to underdefined behavior (#483) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add a way to copy Requests with a different URL (#191) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Regression: make Request constructor account for changes to fill (#484) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Workers now have worker-src in CSP (#528) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Workers now have worker-src in CSP (#528) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update the CSP mappings for requests. (#541) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update the CSP mappings for requests. (#541) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Using integrity with "no-cors" is fine same-origin (#584) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] TypeError on Request.integrity with no-cors mode is a foot gun (#583) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Using integrity with "no-cors" is fine same-origin (#584) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make fetch() use "same-origin" credentials by default (#585) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Access-Control-Expose-Headers: * can be interpreted in two ways (#548) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Enumeration order of interface members (#432) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] No mixin [NoInterfaceObject] usage (#430) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] No mixin [NoInterfaceObject] usage (#430) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] No mixin [NoInterfaceObject] usage (#430) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] No mixin [NoInterfaceObject] usage (#430) (Friday, 1 September)
• [heycam/webidl] No mixin [NoInterfaceObject] usage (#430) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)

Anssi Kostiainen

• Re: [w3c/permissions] A more modest request() (#158) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#615) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#615) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#615) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#614) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#614) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#614) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Thursday, 7 September)
• [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use [Exposed=Window] (#608) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use [Exposed=Window] (#608) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• [w3c/manifest] Use [Exposed=Window] (#608) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Ashley (Scirra)

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTML Modules (#645) (Saturday, 2 September)

Baocang Nie

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTML Modules (#645) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTML Modules (#645) (Thursday, 21 September)

Bede Overend

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Thursday, 7 September)

Ben Kelly

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request ever be a range request if we cannot verify if the underlying resource is the same? (#1201) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow range header to be set by APIs (#560) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow range header to be set by APIs (#560) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request ever be a range request if we cannot verify if the underlying resource is the same? (#1201) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request ever be a range request if we cannot verify if the underlying resource is the same? (#1201) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request ever be a range request if we cannot verify if the underlying resource is the same? (#1201) (Thursday, 28 September)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request ever be a range request if we cannot verify if the underlying resource is the same? (#1201) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] is the browser required to start the ServiceWorker for postMessage() if there is no message event handler? (#1200) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] is the browser required to start the ServiceWorker for postMessage() if there is no message event handler? (#1200) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Monday, 25 September)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] is the browser required to start the ServiceWorker for postMessage() if there is no message event handler? (#1200) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ready promise doesn't work right when controlling registration is resurrected (#1198) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ready promise doesn't work right when controlling registration is resurrected (#1198) (Friday, 22 September)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] ready promise doesn't work right when controlling registration is resurrected (#1198) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request's total bytes isn't set (#604) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "foreign" service-workers mode (#596) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] fetch-frame-resource.https.html has a long timeout to detect page load failed (#1194) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Using integrity with "no-cors" is fine same-origin (#584) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() promise should resolve after promotion to .active (#1187) (Friday, 1 September)

Benjamin C. Wiley Sittler

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for IndexedDB Observers (#189) (Wednesday, 27 September)

Benjamin E. Coe

• Re: [whatwg/url] Inconsistency between Chrome/Node.js in url parsing spec (#345) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Inconsistency between Chrome/Node.js in url parsing spec (#345) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• [whatwg/url] Inconsistency between Chrome/Node.js in url parsing spec (#345) (Wednesday, 20 September)

Benjamin Gruenbaum

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447) (Wednesday, 20 September)

Benoit Girard

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Friday, 22 September)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Wednesday, 13 September)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [heycam/webidl] It shouldn't be possible for objects that implement non-exposed interfaces to appear in the environment (#449) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] What is the expected interaction of [SecureContext] with mixins? (#118) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] What is the expected interaction of [SecureContext] with mixins? (#118) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] What is the expected interaction of [SecureContext] with mixins? (#118) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] What is the expected interaction of [SecureContext] with mixins? (#118) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] We may want to suport constants on namespaces (#440) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• [heycam/webidl] We may want to suport constants on namespaces (#440) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Friday, 1 September)

chaals

• [w3c/webcomponents] CfC: Move Shadow DOM spec to NOTE / Stop work (#670) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Mark ElementTraversal Rec as obsolete (#96) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Charles Vazac

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Friday, 1 September)

Chris Dumez

• Re: [w3c/gamepad] GamepadEvent constructor is missing the type argument (#35) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] GamepadEvent constructor is missing the type argument (#35) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] GamepadEvent constructor is missing the type argument (#35) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] GamepadEvent constructor is missing the type argument (#35) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add missing type argument to the GamepadEvent constructor (#51) (Thursday, 21 September)

coderdecoder

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] IDB Is Crashing Out (#214) (Monday, 18 September)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] IDB Is Crashing Out (#214) (Monday, 18 September)

cynthia

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Serialization of natural language in data formats such as JSON [I18N] (#178) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request review of Keyboard Lock (#192) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of signature-based resource loading restrictions. (#186) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript module import() (#200) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript module import() (#200) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for review: Preload (#202) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Device Memory API (#190) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of signature-based resource loading restrictions. (#186) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WICG Shape Detection API (#176) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WICG Shape Detection API (#176) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for TAG review of Input events level 2 (#173) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebAssembly Response API / Web Embedding (#167) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request review of Keyboard Lock (#192) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Task Scheduling (#72) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Media Capture From DOM Element (#130) (Tuesday, 12 September)

Dan Burzo

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Wednesday, 13 September)

Daniel

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of signature-based resource loading restrictions. (#186) (Wednesday, 27 September)

Daniel Appelquist

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for WebVR (#185) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/packaging-on-the-web] Need to clarify how this relates to HTTP2 (#1) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/packaging-on-the-web] Need to clarify how this relates to HTTP2 (#1) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request to review Image Decode API (#182) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Consider template change to add link to WPTs for far-along specs (#181) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Consider template change to add link to WPTs for far-along specs (#181) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebRTC Stats review (#148) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review OffscreenCanvas, including ImageBitmapRenderingContext (#141) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Custom Paint API to CR (#140) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Custom Paint API to CR (#140) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Timed Text Markup Language 2 (TTML2) (#138) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review Accessibility Object Model (#134) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebUSB (#108) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebUSB (#108) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Privacy Mode (#101) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Streams General issue (#92) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Task Scheduling (#72) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Task Scheduling (#72) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Clear Site Data (#62) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Clear Site Data (#62) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] ads.txt (#201) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] ads.txt (#201) (Tuesday, 26 September)

Daniel Davis

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Privacy Mode (#101) (Tuesday, 26 September)

Daniel Ehrenberg

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebAssembly Response API / Web Embedding (#167) (Tuesday, 26 September)

Daniel Stenberg

• [whatwg/url] why are backslashes accepted for slashes? (#346) (Saturday, 30 September)

David Singer

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Privacy Mode (#101) (Tuesday, 26 September)

David Tobin

• [w3c/editing] Fix typo (#169) (Friday, 15 September)

Dead J. Dona

• [w3c/manifest] changed some working links from http to https (#607) (Monday, 4 September)

Dima Voytenko

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow customizing base of a shadow root (#581) (Thursday, 7 September)

Domenic Denicola

• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add and remove local variables (#814) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Rename abstract operations (#812) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Reorganise TransformStream slots and abstract operations (#776) (Thursday, 28 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Make it easy to create streams with no underlying source/sink/transformer objects (#813) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request to review Image Decode API (#182) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request to review Image Decode API (#182) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request Review: Gesture Delegation (#199) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Change the default highWaterMark for readableStrategy to 0 (#808) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Change default readableStrategy HWM to 0? (#777) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add some extra asserts to TransformStream to clarify invariants (#809) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove the _readableController and _writableController slots (#810) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request to review Image Decode API (#182) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Rename "transformStream" variables to "stream" (#805) (Sunday, 24 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Rename "transformStream" variables to "stream" (#805) (Sunday, 24 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Some assert()s have no description (#807) (Saturday, 23 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix access to removed _errored and _storedError slots (#806) (Saturday, 23 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] What should the behaviour of controller.close() be? (#774) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] What should the behaviour of controller.close() be? (#774) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] ReadableStream IDL type (#445) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableByteStreamControllerPullInto should always transfer the given buffer (#752) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Callsites of TransferArrayBuffer don't all ensure the buffer isn't detached (#751) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] A couple fixes for ArrayBuffer transferring (#753) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] What should the behaviour of controller.close() be? (#774) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] A couple fixes for ArrayBuffer transferring (#753) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove _errored and _storedError from TransformStream (#800) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] do chunk boundaries have to be preserved through to underlying sink? (#739) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: test that start() is called exactly once (#802) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: test that start() is called exactly once (#802) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove _errored and _storedError from TransformStream (#800) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Detect if the TransformStream errored inside write() and reject (#799) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Detect if the TransformStream errored inside write() and reject (#799) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Include "erroring" in the list of states for WritableStream (#803) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Include "erroring" in the list of states for WritableStream (#803) (Friday, 22 September)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript module import() (#200) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Editorial: fix copy/paste error in [EnforceRange] section (#442) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Use some logging framework (#499) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove assertion that RSDefaultControllerClose doesn't throw (#801) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request Review: Gesture Delegation (#199) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Tie the model to the API for pipe chains (#798) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] "2.4. Pipe Chains and Backpressure" (#740) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Always transfer given ArrayBuffer in ReadableByteStreamControllerPullInto (#753) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Always transfer given ArrayBuffer in ReadableByteStreamControllerPullInto (#753) (Friday, 15 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Tie the model to the API for pipe chains (#798) (Friday, 15 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Don't be dismissive about the controller/stream division (#797) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Always transfer given ArrayBuffer in ReadableByteStreamControllerPullInto (#753) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] reader.read() inside strategy.size() doesn't work (#794) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] TransformStream: test enqueue(), close(), error() in bad states (#793) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Clarify some of the ECMAScript conventions applied (#790) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Normative requirements for constructor names? (#775) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Clarify some of the ECMAScript conventions applied (#790) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Clarify some of the ECMAScript conventions applied (#790) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Clarify some of the ECMAScript conventions applied (#790) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] messageerror event should use ExtendableMessageEvent (#1193) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] We may want to suport constants on namespaces (#440) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• [whatwg/dom] "Otherwise, localName is associated attribute’s ..." (#508) (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove legacy callers (#412) (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Update acknowledgments and editorship (#792) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Track PR #412 (#434) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Track PR #412 (#434) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove legacy callers (#412) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] WritableStream feedback ? (#755) (Friday, 8 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Update acknowledgments and editorship (#792) (Friday, 8 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Editorial: explain and link [[CancelSteps]]/[[PullSteps]] (#791) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Headers have become typographically ugly (#781) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Headers have become typographically ugly (#781) (Friday, 8 September)
• [whatwg/streams] Clarify some of the ECMAScript conventions applied (#790) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] What is the expected behaviour of .pipeThrough()? (#765) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove legacy callers (#412) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream's writableDone member (#789) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Which standard defines :defined (#665) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Which standard defines :defined (#665) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider defining inertness in terms of the composed tree (#653) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider defining inertness in terms of the composed tree (#653) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Consider defining inertness in terms of the composed tree (#653) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _transforming member (#788) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add brand check to ReadableStreamBYOBRequest constructor (#787) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Editorial: remove "rethrow" per Infra (#595) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Resize events needed? (#352) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Add a neato informative table of various URL pieces (#337) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add [CEReactions] to createElement() (#506) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Permit closing the writable to close the readable, even with HWM 0 (#786) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Permit closing the writable to close the readable, even with HWM 0 (#786) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Permit any pending writes to complete on error (#785) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Saturday, 2 September)

Dominic Cooney

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebRTC Stats review (#148) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Fix typo (#169) (Friday, 15 September)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Update w3c.json to reflect new Working Group (#1192) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [w3c/quota-api] Add 'beware' warnings to spec/readme (#13) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/quota-api] Add 'beware' warnings to spec/readme (#13) (Friday, 8 September)
• [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Mark ElementTraversal Rec as obsolete (#96) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Resize events needed? (#352) (Tuesday, 5 September)

drwez

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Add specification for AltGraph key & modifier behaviour (#147) (Friday, 15 September)

dzienieszka

• [whatwg/fetch] a (#606) (Friday, 22 September)

falsandtru

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Make importing fail if URL has changed (for SPA, PJAX, and History API) (#669) (Monday, 25 September)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Make importing fail if URL has changed (for SPA, PJAX, and History API) (#669) (Sunday, 24 September)

Federico Brigante

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal to improve the DOM creation api (#150) (Tuesday, 19 September)

Fuqiao Xue

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Mark ElementTraversal Rec as obsolete (#96) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• [w3ctag/packaging-on-the-web] Indicate the spec isn't being worked on (#34) (Friday, 8 September)

g-div

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] user initiated 'uninstall' event (#998) (Thursday, 21 September)

Gary Kacmarcik

• Re: [w3c/permissions] A more modest request() (#158) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Pull request for Issue #40 (#42) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Pull request for Issue #40 (#42) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#159) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#54) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Editorial: typo (#53) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] User gesture requirement for Clipboard API access (#52) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] How do we address cross-origin selection/focus changes? (#38) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Unclear when input events are triggered (#145) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Unclear when input events are triggered (#145) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Thursday, 14 September)
• [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• [w3c/clipboard-apis] User gesture requirement for Clipboard API access (#52) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• [w3c/uievents] Ensure prose for key press handling works well with KeyboardLock (#158) (Thursday, 7 September)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request review of Keyboard Lock (#192) (Thursday, 7 September)

glococo

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] FetchObserver (for a single fetch) (#607) (Thursday, 28 September)

Gordon P. Hemsley

• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Saturday, 16 September)

guidou

• Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Thursday, 14 September)

Guilherme

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow unique start_url for subdomains (#470) (Friday, 29 September)

Guy Bedford

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] preload, destinations, and module scripts (#486) (Friday, 8 September)

Hadley Beeman

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TV-Specific Web Subsetting (#105) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TV-Specific Web Subsetting (#105) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TV-Specific Web Subsetting (#105) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Trusted Types (#198) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of signature-based resource loading restrictions. (#186) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for TAG review of Input events level 2 (#173) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TV-Specific Web Subsetting (#105) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Tuesday, 5 September)

haib56

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Thursday, 14 September)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Tuesday, 12 September)

Hayato Ito

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Make importing fail if URL has changed (for SPA, PJAX, and History API) (#669) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Make importing fail if URL has changed (for SPA, PJAX, and History API) (#669) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Make importing fail if URL has changed (for SPA, PJAX, and History API) (#669) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Set event.target to null when dispatching finishes at ShadowRoot (#513) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Set event.target to null when dispatching finishes at ShadowRoot (#513) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Improve the accessibility of SVG files which are used in the spec (#341) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Improve the accessibility of SVG files which are used in the spec (#341) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should <link> work inside Shadow DOM? (#628) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstream Shadow DOM spec to DOM/HTML Standard (#377) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should <link> work inside Shadow DOM? (#628) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [question] Why are we unable to build web components from SVG elements? (#650) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support for pseudo elements with ::slotted() selectors (#655) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Link to example from early in spec (#656) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow custom `input` element content (#659) (Monday, 4 September)

hfhchan

• Re: [w3c/editing] INPUT/TEXTAREA should support subset of execCommand (#160) (Thursday, 14 September)

Hongchan Choi

• [whatwg/dom] Fix 515: Expose Event, EventTarget to AudioWorklet (#516) (Friday, 29 September)
• [whatwg/dom] Expose Event, EventTarget to AudioWorklet (#515) (Thursday, 28 September)

Ian Kilpatrick

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Friday, 1 September)

Ilya Grigorik

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for review: Preload (#202) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Thursday, 7 September)

Ivan Babak

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447) (Wednesday, 20 September)

Ivan Nikulin

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)

Jake Archibald

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request ever be a range request if we cannot verify if the underlying resource is the same? (#1201) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove incumbent/fetching record from Cache behavior (#1190) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] should FetchEvent.request ever be a range request if we cannot verify if the underlying resource is the same? (#1201) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Task Scheduling (#72) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• [whatwg/dom] Example should check for current aborted state (#514) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] is the browser required to start the ServiceWorker for postMessage() if there is no message event handler? (#1200) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] is the browser required to start the ServiceWorker for postMessage() if there is no message event handler? (#1200) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] is the browser required to start the ServiceWorker for postMessage() if there is no message event handler? (#1200) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Monday, 25 September)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making functional events simpler (#1199) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ready promise doesn't work right when controlling registration is resurrected (#1198) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ready promise doesn't work right when controlling registration is resurrected (#1198) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Issues with "Handle Functional Event" (#1196) (Thursday, 21 September)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Express the job queue in terms of parallel queues (#1197) (Thursday, 21 September)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Issues with "Handle Functional Event" (#1196) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Fetch abort & no-cors requests (#563) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] CORS preflights need a service-workers mode of "none" (#598) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] CORS preflights need a service-workers mode of "none" (#598) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Ability to detect CORS failures vs connection failures (#605) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Ability to detect CORS failures vs connection failures (#605) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Ability to detect CORS failures vs connection failures (#605) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Odd format for fetch callbacks (#536) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Odd format for fetch callbacks (#536) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Request's total bytes isn't set (#604) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Odd format for fetch callbacks (#536) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] messageerror event should use ExtendableMessageEvent (#1193) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Update w3c.json to reflect new Working Group (#1192) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Update w3c.json to reflect new Working Group (#1192) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1188) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Header to opt out of opaque redirect (#601) (Monday, 11 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Header to opt out of opaque redirect (#601) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Thursday, 7 September)
• [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting fetch (#523) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "foreign" service-workers mode (#596) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "foreign" service-workers mode (#596) (Tuesday, 5 September)

James Browning

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTML Modules (#645) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why do we really need hyphens? (#658) (Thursday, 21 September)

James M Snell

• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Friday, 15 September)

James, please

• [whatwg/fetch] History behind the decision to make fetch return a Promise (#611) (Friday, 29 September)

jan-ivar

• Re: [w3c/permissions] "prompt the user to choose" algorithm impedance mismatch. (#161) (Saturday, 23 September)
• [w3c/permissions] "prompt the user to choose" algorithm impedance mismatch. (#161) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Remove permissions.request() and permissions.revoke(). (#159) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Remove permissions.request() and permissions.revoke(). (#159) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Remove permissions.request() and permissions.revoke(). (#159) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] A more modest request() (#158) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Cross-spec device identification & association (#64) (Tuesday, 5 September)

JaninaSajka

• Re: [w3c/push-api] APA WG comment: ability to pause notifications (#259) (Tuesday, 26 September)

Jeff17Robbins

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)

Jeffrey Yasskin

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Modeling media auto-playing as a permission? (#203) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] docs: Restore pieces of CONTRIBUTING.md lost in abe8198c22. (#157) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Move to using Echidna (#24) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] chore: make Echidna publication actually work (#160) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Consider removing Permissions.revoke(). (#46) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Remove permissions.request() and permissions.revoke(). (#159) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] "prompt the user to choose" algorithm impedance mismatch. (#161) (Saturday, 23 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] "Requesting more permission" algorithms are tightly coupled to prompts (#153) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] A more modest request() (#158) (Friday, 22 September)
• [w3c/permissions] chore: make Echidna publication actually work (#160) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Remove permissions.request() and permissions.revoke(). (#159) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Drop .request() (#83) (Friday, 22 September)
• [w3c/permissions] Remove permissions.request() and permissions.revoke(). (#159) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] A more modest request() (#158) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Fix the links to permissions defined in other specs. (#156) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] chore(perm interface): Fix return value handling (#143) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] chore(perm interface): Fix return value handling (#143) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• [w3c/permissions] docs: Restore pieces of CONTRIBUTING.md lost in abe8198c22. (#157) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• [w3c/permissions] Fix the links to permissions defined in other specs. (#156) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [w3c/webcomponents] delegatesFocus is in bad shape (#666) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Clarify "new information about the user’s intent" definition (#154) (Thursday, 7 September)
• [w3c/manifest] Export the 'install' term. (#609) (Thursday, 7 September)

jeisinger

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow connection reuse for request without credentials when TLS client auth is not in use (#341) (Thursday, 7 September)

Jim Montgomery

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Thursday, 7 September)
• [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Joe Pea

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ES5 consideration for custom elements (#423) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ES5 consideration for custom elements (#423) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Saturday, 23 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Thursday, 21 September)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element definition order issues. (#668) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Method for detecting finally-distributed nodes. (#611) (Sunday, 17 September)

Johannes Wilm

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for TAG review of Input events level 2 (#173) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for TAG review of Input events level 2 (#173) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Unclear when input events are triggered (#145) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/editing] queryCommandSupported('paste') clarification for Chrome (#167) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/editing] queryCommandSupported('paste') clarification for Chrome (#167) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/editing] queryCommandSupported('paste') clarification for Chrome (#167) (Tuesday, 5 September)

Jon Piesing

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TV-Specific Web Subsetting (#105) (Tuesday, 26 September)

Jonathon Kereliuk

• Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Friday, 15 September)

Joseph Orbegoso Pea

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] has="mixin this, mixin that" (#663) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Method for detecting finally-distributed nodes. (#611) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Method for detecting finally-distributed nodes. (#611) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why do we really need hyphens? (#658) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow custom element naming on a per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurpose the is="" attribute (or make a new attribute with a new name) (#662) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Repurpose the is="" attribute (or make a new attribute with a new name) (#662) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [question] Why are we unable to build web components from SVG elements? (#650) (Monday, 4 September)

Joseph Pecoraro

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response `statusText` is ambiguous and unclear for HTTP/2 (#599) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Response `statusText` is ambiguous and unclear for HTTP/2 (#599) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Josh Karlin

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request review for PauseFrame API (#196) (Thursday, 28 September)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request review for PauseFrame API (#196) (Thursday, 14 September)

Joshua Bell

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support Annotated Types in IDBFactory and IDBObjectStore (#216) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support annotated types in IDBFactory and IDBObjectStore (#217) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support Annotated Types in IDBFactory and IDBObjectStore (#216) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support annotated types in IDBFactory and IDBObjectStore (#217) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support Annotated Types in IDBFactory and IDBObjectStore (#216) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] lastModifiedDate on File is not a thing (#215) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] lastModifiedDate on File is not a thing (#215) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] IDB Is Crashing Out (#214) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] IDB Is Crashing Out (#214) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Thursday, 14 September)

jugglinmike

• Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Monday, 18 September)

Jungkee Song

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Issues with "Handle Functional Event" (#1196) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making functional events simpler (#1199) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making functional events simpler (#1199) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making functional events simpler (#1199) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making functional events simpler (#1199) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making functional events simpler (#1199) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove incumbent/fetching record from Cache behavior (#1190) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove incumbent/fetching record from Cache behavior (#1190) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove incumbent/fetching record from Cache behavior (#1190) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove incumbent/fetching record from Cache behavior (#1190) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove incumbent/fetching record from Cache behavior (#1190) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove incumbent/fetching record from Cache behavior (#1190) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove incumbent/fetching record from Cache behavior (#1190) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove incumbent/fetching record from Cache behavior (#1190) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() promise should resolve after promotion to .active (#1187) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] messageerror event should use ExtendableMessageEvent (#1193) (Wednesday, 13 September)

Justin Fagnani

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element - untrackable upgrade (#671) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Non-class based example of customElement.define() (#587) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Saturday, 16 September)

Justin Novosad

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review OffscreenCanvas, including ImageBitmapRenderingContext (#141) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review OffscreenCanvas, including ImageBitmapRenderingContext (#141) (Tuesday, 26 September)

Jxck

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1188) (Friday, 8 September)

Kagami Sascha Rosylight

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Friday, 22 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Thursday, 7 September)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add an icon "purpose" for displaying on the theme color (#617) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#615) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#615) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#614) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all of the members (#612) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all of the members (#612) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for some of the members (#612) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for some of the members (#612) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Consider providing `navigation` event (#1028) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [w3c/manifest] Verify that ImageObject in Web Payment Handler spec matches what we have (#610) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Consider providing `navigation` event (#1028) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Export the 'install' term. (#609) (Thursday, 7 September)

L. David Baron

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebUSB (#108) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/packaging-on-the-web] Indicate the spec isn't being worked on (#34) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Serialization of natural language in data formats such as JSON [I18N] (#178) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request review of Keyboard Lock (#192) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request review for Scroll Boundary Behavior (#193) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Intersection Observer review (#197) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Serialization of natural language in data formats such as JSON [I18N] (#178) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Consider template change to add link to WPTs for far-along specs (#181) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Task Scheduling (#72) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request Review: Gesture Delegation (#199) (Tuesday, 19 September)

Lars Knudsen

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebUSB (#108) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebUSB (#108) (Wednesday, 13 September)

lauradaquila

• [w3c/selection-api] Include information about where the selection is ending (#93) (Thursday, 28 September)

Lisa S

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support annotated types (#217) (Monday, 25 September)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Support annotated types (#217) (Monday, 25 September)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Support Annotated Types in IDBFactory and IDBObjectStore (#216) (Monday, 25 September)

Luke Wagner

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebAssembly Response API / Web Embedding (#167) (Tuesday, 26 September)

Léonie Watson

• [w3c/uievents-key] Implementation report (#45) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• [w3c/uievents-code] Need an implementation report (#20) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Timeline to Recommendation? (#61) (Thursday, 21 September)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Intersection Observer review (#197) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Thursday, 14 September)
• [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Fri Nov 10 (Web Components) (#95) (Sunday, 3 September)
• [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Thu Nov 9 (WebPlat general) (#94) (Sunday, 3 September)
• [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Tue Nov 7 (Editing TF) (#93) (Sunday, 3 September)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Time at TPAC? (#22) (Friday, 1 September)

Majid Valipour

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request review for Scroll Boundary Behavior (#193) (Thursday, 7 September)

Makoto Kato

• Re: [w3c/editing] INPUT/TEXTAREA should support subset of execCommand (#160) (Thursday, 14 September)

Manochehrgham

• [whatwg/encoding] index (#122) (Monday, 25 September)

Marcos Cáceres

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add an icon "purpose" for displaying on the theme color (#617) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#614) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] chore: make Echidna publication actually work (#160) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Added missing space. (#616) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Added missing space. (#616) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#615) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Fix the links to permissions defined in other specs. (#156) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Fix the links to permissions defined in other specs. (#156) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] docs: Restore pieces of CONTRIBUTING.md lost in abe8198c22. (#157) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all of the members (#612) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all of the members (#612) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for some of the members (#612) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for some of the members (#612) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Verify that ImageObject in Web Payment Handler spec matches what we have (#610) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Verify that ImageObject in Web Payment Handler spec matches what we have (#610) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [w3c/clipboard-apis] Editorial: typo (#53) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Editorial: typo (#53) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Move EventHandler to DOM spec (#509) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Move EventHandler to DOM spec (#509) (Monday, 11 September)
• [whatwg/dom] Move EventHandler to DOM spec (#509) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use [Exposed=Window] (#608) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] changed some working links from http to https (#607) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] changed some working links from http to https (#607) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] changed some working links from http to https (#607) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Adding slots [initial braindump] (#258) (Monday, 4 September)

Marijn Kruisselbrink

• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Don't update FileReader's result until "LOAD" (#79) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Don't update FileReader's result until "LOAD" (#79) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Don't update FileReader's result until "LOAD" (#79) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Don't update FileReader's result until "LOAD" (#79) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Don't update FileReader's result until "LOAD" (#79) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Don't update FileReader's result until "LOAD" (#79) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Don't update FileReader's result until "LOAD" (#79) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Define cloning of Blob and FileList objects inline (#32) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] fetch-frame-resource.https.html has a long timeout to detect page load failed (#1194) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1188) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] messageerror event should use ExtendableMessageEvent (#1193) (Tuesday, 12 September)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should Content-Type header be stripped when redirecting from POST to GET? (#609) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] 421 Status Code (#497) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Privacy Mode (#101) (Wednesday, 27 September)

Martin Thomson

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Remove permissions.request() and permissions.revoke(). (#159) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Add ClipboardPermissionDescriptor (#155) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "serviceworker" from RequestDestination (#603) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Remove "serviceworker" from RequestDestination (#603) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] "serviceworker" in the RequestDestination enum (#602) (Tuesday, 12 September)

Masayuki Nakano

• Re: [w3c/uievents-key] Implementation report (#45) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Rationale for "untrusted events do not trigger default actions" (#160) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Unclear when input events are triggered (#145) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Add specification for AltGraph key & modifier behaviour (#147) (Wednesday, 20 September)

Matt Falkenhagen

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Why are only a subset of JS mime types allowed? (#1033) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] fetch-frame-resource.https.html has a long timeout to detect page load failed (#1194) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] fetch-frame-resource.https.html has a long timeout to detect page load failed (#1194) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() promise should resolve after promotion to .active (#1187) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() promise should resolve after promotion to .active (#1187) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() promise should resolve after promotion to .active (#1187) (Friday, 1 September)

Matt Giuca

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add an icon "purpose" for displaying on the theme color (#617) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• [w3c/manifest] Add an icon "purpose" for displaying on the theme color (#617) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all the members (#613) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for all of the members (#612) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add IDL section and define IDL for some of the members (#612) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Consider providing `navigation` event (#1028) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Drop density descriptor from spec (#450) (Monday, 18 September)

Matthew Phillips

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)

Michael Green

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Easier way to inherit properties from custom elements (#667) (Saturday, 16 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Easier way to inherit properties from custom elements (#667) (Saturday, 16 September)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Component inheritance (#667) (Saturday, 16 September)

MICHAEL JACKSON

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1188) (Friday, 15 September)

Michael Layzell

• [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clarify clipboardData's interaction with the Drag Data Store (#50) (Tuesday, 5 September)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Sunday, 24 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] a (#606) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "foreign" service-workers mode (#596) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add `Last-Event-ID` as CORS-safelisted request-header (#597) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add `Last-Event-ID` as CORS-safelisted request-header (#597) (Monday, 4 September)

Miguel Casas-Sanchez

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] MediaStream Recorder (#131) (Tuesday, 5 September)

Mike West

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of signature-based resource loading restrictions. (#186) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Does `TreatNullAs` apply to `DOMString` inside a union type? (#441) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Monday, 18 September)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Trusted Types (#198) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Monday, 18 September)
• [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Friday, 15 September)

Mikhail

• [whatwg/encoding] Missing legacy encodings (#123) (Friday, 29 September)

Mounir Lamouri

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request Review: Gesture Delegation (#199) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request Review: Gesture Delegation (#199) (Tuesday, 19 September)

Ms2ger

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Use OrdinarySet instead of [[Set]] (#201) (Friday, 8 September)

Navid Zolghadr

• [w3c/uievents] Can any code be run between mouseup and click handlers? (#161) (Thursday, 28 September)

Neil Stansbury

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow root z-index/stacking context behaviour in custom element (#672) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow root z-index/stacking context behaviour in custom element (#672) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow root z-index/stacking context behaviour in custom element (#672) (Saturday, 30 September)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow root z-index/stacking context behaviour in custom element (#672) (Saturday, 30 September)

Nicolas Hoffmann

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] TypeError on Request.integrity with no-cors mode is a foot gun (#583) (Tuesday, 12 September)

Nigel Megitt

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Timed Text Markup Language 2 (TTML2) (#138) (Tuesday, 26 September)

nondebug

• Re: [w3c/gamepad] GamepadEvent constructor is missing the type argument (#35) (Friday, 22 September)

Owen Campbell-Moore

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add an icon "purpose" for displaying on the theme color (#617) (Monday, 25 September)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Sunday, 24 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#87) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Add [Exposed=Window] to Constructor (#88) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Add [Exposed=Window] to Constructor (#88) (Thursday, 21 September)
• [w3c/touch-events] Add [Exposed=Window] to Constructor (#88) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces (#87) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] "List of TouchEvent types" contains requirements (#84) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] "List of TouchEvent types" contains requirements (#84) (Tuesday, 5 September)

Patrick Hamann

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1188) (Friday, 15 September)

Patrick Meenan

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow connection reuse for request without credentials when TLS client auth is not in use (#341) (Thursday, 7 September)

Paul Adenot

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Monday, 25 September)

Peter Linss

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for review: Preload (#202) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Intersection Observer review (#197) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Device Memory API (#190) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review of signature-based resource loading restrictions. (#186) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Media Capture From DOM Element (#130) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Media Capture From DOM Element (#130) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Add request for links to WPT tests in issue template (#191) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Add request for links to WPT tests in issue template (#191) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Add request for links to WPT tests in issue template (#191) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Cross-spec device identification & association (#64) (Tuesday, 5 September)

Peter Rushforth

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) (Thursday, 7 September)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Removing the fullscreen element won't fire a fullscreenchange event (#105) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Removing the fullscreen element won't fire a fullscreenchange event (#105) (Friday, 29 September)
• [whatwg/fullscreen] Removing the fullscreen element won't fire a fullscreenchange event (#105) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Remove nodes from top layer as part of the removing steps (#102) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Removing `:fullscreen-ancestor` pseudo-class causes webcompat issue (#103) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Removing `:fullscreen-ancestor` pseudo-class causes webcompat issue (#103) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Remove nodes from top layer as part of the removing steps (#102) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Remove nodes from top layer as part of the removing steps (#102) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• [whatwg/fullscreen] Disallow dialog.requestFullscreen() (#104) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Remove nodes from top layer as part of the removing steps (#102) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Remove nodes from top layer as part of the removing steps (#102) (Saturday, 23 September)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] GamepadEvent constructor is missing the type argument (#35) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] GamepadEvent constructor is missing the type argument (#35) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Define percent decoding of strings (#340) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Define data: URLs (#579) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Remove nodes from top layer as part of the removing steps (#102) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• [whatwg/fullscreen] Remove nodes from top layer as part of the removing steps (#102) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Meta: require Trusty as the Travis dist (#48) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Meta: require Trusty as the Travis dist (#48) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• [whatwg/storage] Meta: require Trusty as the Travis dist (#48) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Sunday, 3 September)
• [whatwg/encoding] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#121) (Sunday, 3 September)

Philip Walton

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Cloned responses should not have immutable headers (#608) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Cloned responses should not have immutable headers (#608) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• [whatwg/fetch] Cloned responses should not have immutable headers (#608) (Tuesday, 26 September)

PhistucK

• Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Standardize extension to content type mapping? (#51) (Thursday, 14 September)
• [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Make XPathResult (returned document.evaluate(...)) iterable (#97) (Friday, 8 September)

pipcet

• [w3c/uievents] Rationale for "untrusted events do not trigger default actions" (#160) (Wednesday, 27 September)

r12a

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Serialization of natural language in data formats such as JSON [I18N] (#178) (Thursday, 28 September)

rajkjag

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Header to opt out of opaque redirect (#601) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Header to opt out of opaque redirect (#601) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Header to opt out of opaque redirect (#601) (Monday, 11 September)

RangerMauve

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447) (Tuesday, 12 September)

Raphael Kubo da Costa

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] TypeError on Request.integrity with no-cors mode is a foot gun (#583) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Web compat implications of making getAllResponseHeaders lowercase (#146) (Friday, 8 September)

raymeskhoury

• Re: [w3c/permissions] A more modest request() (#158) (Saturday, 23 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Sunday, 17 September)

Reilly Grant

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebUSB (#108) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] A more modest request() (#158) (Friday, 22 September)

rektide

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove "foreign" service-workers mode (#596) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1188) (Thursday, 14 September)

Rick Byers

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] ReportingObserver (#195) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Thursday, 7 September)

Rimas Misevičius

• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Inconsistency between Chrome/Node.js in url parsing spec (#345) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Monday, 18 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• [whatwg/url] Fix Windows drive letter handling in the file slash state (#343) (Monday, 11 September)

Rob Dodson

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element - untrackable upgrade (#671) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Sunday, 17 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)

Rob Wu

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clipboard Permission (#51) (Friday, 15 September)

rsjanabasis

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make fetch() use "same-origin" credentials by default (#585) (Saturday, 2 September)

Rune Lillesveen

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support for pseudo elements with ::slotted() selectors (#655) (Tuesday, 26 September)

Ryosuke Niwa

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow root z-index/stacking context behaviour in custom element (#672) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow root z-index/stacking context behaviour in custom element (#672) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element - untrackable upgrade (#671) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element - untrackable upgrade (#671) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element - untrackable upgrade (#671) (Friday, 29 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom Element definition ordering can cause difficult-to-find bugs. (#668) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clarify clipboardData's interaction with the Drag Data Store (#50) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Clarify clipboardData's interaction with the Drag Data Store (#50) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Further upgrade of custom elements (#620) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Synthetic click activation steps should state whether the event is composed or not (#578) (Tuesday, 5 September)

Salvador de la Puente González

• [w3c/manifest] Consider adding a theme manifest member or a separate spec for browser customisation (#618) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add an icon "purpose" for displaying on the theme color (#617) (Wednesday, 27 September)

samweinig

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove legacy callers (#412) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove legacy callers (#412) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove legacy callers (#412) (Thursday, 7 September)

Sebastian Markbåge

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)

Sebastian Müller

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow] How should various document internal references work when SVG is being used in shadow DOM (#179) (Tuesday, 12 September)

Shawn Huang

• [whatwg/storage] Clarify the expectation if pushState() data is covered by Storage Standard (#50) (Thursday, 28 September)

Simon Pieters

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/touch-events] Specify what browsers do on non-touch devices (#64) (Thursday, 14 September)

sleevi

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Allow connection reuse for request without credentials when TLS client auth is not in use (#341) (Thursday, 7 September)

snuggs

• Re: [whatwg/dom] 📝 Editorial: add missing 'if' (#512) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] 📝 Editorial: add missing 'if' (#512) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] 📝 Editorial: add missing 'if' (#512) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] 📝 Fix #508 Grammatical error with missing 'if' (#512) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "Otherwise, localName is associated attribute’s ..." (#508) (Thursday, 14 September)
• [whatwg/dom] 📝 Fix #508 Grammatical error with missing 'if' (#512) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing [PrimaryGlobal] and requiring [Exposed] (#365) (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Which standard defines :defined (#665) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstreaming Custom Elements and Outstanding v1 (#664) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstreaming Shadow DOM and outstanding v1 work (#661) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Agenda for W3C TPAC 2017 (Web Components) (#641) (Thursday, 7 September)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Upstreaming Custom Elements and Outstanding v1 (#664) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Upstreaming Shadow DOM and outstanding v1 work (#661) (Thursday, 7 September)

spanicker

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Device Memory API (#190) (Thursday, 28 September)

Stuart P. Bentley

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Attempting to modify a fetch after it has completed / aborted / failed (#448) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447) (Wednesday, 20 September)

T.J. Crowder

• Re: [whatwg/dom] element.closest(selector, container) (#162) (Friday, 22 September)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Which standard defines :defined (#665) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Which standard defines :defined (#665) (Thursday, 7 September)

Takayoshi Kochi

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Set event.target to null when dispatching finishes at ShadowRoot (#513) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Set event.target to null when dispatching finishes at ShadowRoot (#513) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Set event.target to null when dispatching finishes at ShadowRoot (#513) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Set event.target to null when dispatching finishes at ShadowRoot (#513) (Friday, 15 September)
• [whatwg/dom] Set event.target to null when dispatching finishes at ShadowRoot (#513) (Friday, 15 September)
• [whatwg/dom] Event.target should return null after dispatch is complete, when stopped at ShadowRoot (#511) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream `delegatesFocus` property of ShadowRootInit from W3C spec. (#367) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] delegatesFocus is in bad shape (#666) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] delegatesFocus is in bad shape (#666) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Upstream `delegatesFocus` property of ShadowRootInit from W3C spec. (#367) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] delegatesFocus is in bad shape (#666) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Fri Nov 10 (Web Components) (#95) (Monday, 4 September)

Takeshi Yoshino

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make fetch() use "same-origin" credentials by default (#585) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add TransformStream tests for re-entrant strategies (#795) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove TransformStream _readableClosed member (#782) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Thomas Steiner

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Added missing space. (#616) (Friday, 22 September)
• [w3c/manifest] Added missing space. (#616) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#615) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#615) (Friday, 22 September)
• [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#615) (Friday, 22 September)
• [w3c/manifest] Removed six occurrences of superfluous spaces after quotes. (#614) (Friday, 22 September)

Till Schneidereit

• Re: [whatwg/streams] A couple fixes for ArrayBuffer transferring (#753) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Always transfer given ArrayBuffer in ReadableByteStreamControllerPullInto (#753) (Friday, 15 September)

Timo Tijhof

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for review: Preload (#202) (Thursday, 28 September)

Timothy Gu

• Re: [whatwg/url] why are backslashes accepted for slashes? (#346) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] why are backslashes accepted for slashes? (#346) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Clarify nullable types for constants (#447) (Friday, 22 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Clarify nullable types for constants (#447) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] ES-to-IDL conversion broken for annotated types (#443) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Does `TreatNullAs` apply to `DOMString` inside a union type? (#441) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove legacy callers (#412) (Tuesday, 12 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Cite RFC 2781 informatively (#439) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Cite RFC 2781 informatively (#439) (Monday, 11 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Cite RFC 2781 informatively (#439) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Informative document cited as normative reference (#438) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Various editorial updates related to ECMAScript (#436) (Monday, 11 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Informative document cited as normative reference (#438) (Sunday, 10 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Typography: IDL true and false (#437) (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Various editorial updates related to ECMAScript (#436) (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Various editorial updates related to ECMAScript (#436) (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Various editorial updates related to ECMAScript (#436) (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Various editorial updates related to ECMAScript (#436) (Saturday, 9 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Various editorial updates related to ECMAScript (#436) (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Remove legacy callers (#412) (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Meta: Use OrdinarySetWithOwnDescriptor (#435) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Define percent decoding of strings (#340) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Thursday, 7 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Track PR #412 (#434) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Add a neato informative table of various URL pieces (#337) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Add a neato informative table of various URL pieces (#337) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Link to ES for "array index" (#427) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Link to ES for "array index" (#427) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Editorial: correctly reference ES bindings section on constants (#431) (Friday, 1 September)

Tobie Langel

• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Saturday, 30 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] What is the expected interaction of [SecureContext] with mixins? (#118) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] What is the expected interaction of [SecureContext] with mixins? (#118) (Thursday, 28 September)
• [heycam/webidl] It shouldn't be possible for objects that implement non-exposed interfaces to appear in the environment (#449) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] What is the expected interaction of [SecureContext] with mixins? (#118) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] What is the expected interaction of [SecureContext] with mixins? (#118) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] What is the expected interaction of [SecureContext] with mixins? (#118) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Does the "required" dictionary member keyword affect output? (#382) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Does the "required" dictionary member keyword affect output? (#382) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Serialization of natural language in data formats such as JSON [I18N] (#178) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Serialization of natural language in data formats such as JSON [I18N] (#178) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Does `TreatNullAs` apply to `DOMString` inside a union type? (#441) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Does `TreatNullAs` apply to `DOMString` inside a union type? (#441) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Clarify nullable types for constants (#447) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing nullables from allowed constant types (#448) (Monday, 25 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Investigate removing nullables from allowed constant types (#448) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Clarify nullable types for constants (#447) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Clarify nullable types for constants (#447) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Clarify nullable types for constants (#447) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Clarify nullable types for constants (#447) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add an informative section on overloads vs. unions/optional (#307) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Why is a constant type nullable? (#446) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add a section on overloads vs. union/optional (#426) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] ES-to-IDL conversion broken for annotated types (#443) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Add support for annotated types in ES to IDL conversion algorithm (#444) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] ES-to-IDL conversion broken for annotated types (#443) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Editorial: fix copy/paste error in [EnforceRange] section (#442) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Add support for annotated types in ES to IDL conversion algorithm (#444) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [heycam/webidl] ES-to-IDL conversion broken for annotated types (#443) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Editorial: fix copy/paste error in [EnforceRange] section (#442) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Does `TreatNullAs` apply to `DOMString` inside a union type? (#441) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Does `TreatNullAs` apply to `DOMString` inside a union type? (#441) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Does `TreatNullAs` apply to `DOMString` inside a union type? (#441) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Does `TreatNullAs` apply to `DOMString` inside a union type? (#441) (Tuesday, 19 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] We may want to suport constants on namespaces (#440) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] We may want to suport constants on namespaces (#440) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] We may want to suport constants on namespaces (#440) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Various editorial updates related to ECMAScript (#436) (Monday, 11 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Various editorial updates related to ECMAScript (#436) (Sunday, 10 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Use OrdinarySet instead of [[Set]] (#201) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Meta: Use OrdinarySetWithOwnDescriptor (#435) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Meta: Use OrdinarySetWithOwnDescriptor (#435) (Friday, 8 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Meta: Use OrdinarySetWithOwnDescriptor (#435) (Friday, 8 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Track PR #412 (#434) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Link to ES for "array index" (#427) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Explain why array index property names cannot be 2^32 - 1 (#409) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Saturday, 2 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Saturday, 2 September)
• [heycam/webidl] [WIP] Add mixins (#433) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Designing mixins (#363) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Enumeration order of interface members (#432) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Editorial: correctly reference ES bindings section on constants (#431) (Friday, 1 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Enumeration order of interface members (#432) (Friday, 1 September)
• [heycam/webidl] Editorial: correctly reference ES bindings section on constants (#431) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] No mixin [NoInterfaceObject] usage (#430) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] No mixin [NoInterfaceObject] usage (#430) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] No mixin [NoInterfaceObject] usage (#430) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] No mixin [NoInterfaceObject] usage (#430) (Friday, 1 September)

Tomek Wytrębowicz

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Toni-Jan Keith Monserrat

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Sunday, 17 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Sunday, 17 September)

Travis Leithead

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for WebVR (#185) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for WebVR (#185) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for WebVR (#185) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request Review: Gesture Delegation (#199) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request Review: Gesture Delegation (#199) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for IndexedDB Observers (#189) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Device Memory API (#190) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for IndexedDB Observers (#189) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for TAG review of Input events level 2 (#173) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Add request for links to WPT tests in issue template (#191) (Tuesday, 5 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Cross-spec device identification & association (#64) (Tuesday, 5 September)

Trey Shugart

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why do we really need hyphens? (#658) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Easier way to inherit properties from custom elements (#667) (Saturday, 16 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) (Thursday, 7 September)

Valentin Gosu

• Re: [whatwg/url] Consider percent-encoding more characters in "fragment state" (#344) (Friday, 15 September)

Varun Singh

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebRTC Stats review (#148) (Tuesday, 26 September)

Victor Costan

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] IDB Is Crashing Out (#214) (Monday, 18 September)

vmpstr

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request to review Image Decode API (#182) (Wednesday, 27 September)

Wired Earp

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Saturday, 9 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A new attribute similar to is="", but would allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element. (#662) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why do we really need hyphens? (#658) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why do we really need hyphens? (#658) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Xiaoqian Wu

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support annotated types in IDBFactory and IDBObjectStore (#217) (Monday, 25 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Friday, 22 September)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Thursday, 21 September)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Fix typo (#169) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Fix typo (#169) (Friday, 15 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Travis build is always broken and seems completely useless (#407) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Travis build is always broken and seems completely useless (#407) (Wednesday, 6 September)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Travis build is always broken and seems completely useless (#407) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Xidorn Quan

• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Remove nodes from top layer as part of the removing steps (#102) (Thursday, 28 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Removing `:fullscreen-ancestor` pseudo-class causes webcompat issue (#103) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Removing `:fullscreen-ancestor` pseudo-class causes webcompat issue (#103) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Disallow dialog.requestFullscreen() (#104) (Wednesday, 27 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Remove nodes from top layer as part of the removing steps (#102) (Monday, 25 September)
• [whatwg/fullscreen] Removing `:fullscreen-ancestor` pseudo-class causes webcompat issue (#103) (Thursday, 14 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Remove nodes from top layer as part of the removing steps (#102) (Sunday, 10 September)

Yoav Weiss

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for review: Preload (#202) (Thursday, 28 September)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request for review: Preload (#202) (Tuesday, 26 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Wednesday, 13 September)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188) (Tuesday, 5 September)

yosin

• Re: [w3c/editing] queryCommandSupported('paste') clarification for Chrome (#167) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Yutaka Hirano

• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Updating to fit with fetch aborting (#152) (Friday, 8 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Monday, 4 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adjust wildcard handling slightly (#592) (Friday, 1 September)

Yves Lafon

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Wednesday, 20 September)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#517) (Wednesday, 6 September)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 September 2017 23:33:34 UTC