Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509) from Andrea Giammarchi on 2017-09-07 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from September 2017)

From: Andrea Giammarchi <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 08:04:45 +0000 (UTC)
To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webcomponents/issues/509/327722495@github.com>

I'm always for the least "_overthinking_" when it comes to names.

If @rniwa says "_that's pretty much mixins_" and the word _mixins_ came up already to describe this intent (and nobody asked "_what do you mean by mixins_" ) maybe _mixins_ is the term to use?

```html
<any-element mixins="behavior1 behavior2" />
```

That would work, it would put an end to the `is` confusion and story, it can be easily polyfilled too. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/509#issuecomment-327722495

Received on Thursday, 7 September 2017 08:05:44 UTC