Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189)

Just to clarify, we do trigger an immediate update check if updateViaCache is changed.  Another glitch with a timestamp service worker script:

https://sw-change-updateviacache-with-update.glitch.me/

Gives:

```
==> reg1.updateViaCache: imports
==> reg2.updateViaCache: none
==> reg1 === reg2: true
==> reg2.installing: [object ServiceWorker]
==> reg2.waiting: null
==> reg2.active: [object ServiceWorker]
```

I think this is reasonable to do, but not sure if it should be required by the spec.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1189#issuecomment-329808807