Re: [whatwg/url] Add a neato informative table of various URL pieces (#337)

> Note also that `?` is not part of the `pathname` getter.

Oops, an off-by-one.

> In particular different schemes

That does indeed sound like a nice idea. 

> You also omitted the origin field

I did so intentionally, as it's not a concept intrinsically related to URL parsing, but rather more about Web apps/security. And because it's hard.

----

I did a table version with a few variants. The first is a straight translation of the SVG graph. The second is closer to the version in the Node.js doc. The third is the same as the second but has `origin`, mainly there to show how ugly it is. The forth is a URN for fun. I do like the fact that you can link to the spec for that exact attribute, but with some coloring I still think the SVG one is a bit prettier.

![screenshot from 2017-09-05 16-07-49](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1538624/30051381-646ac596-9254-11e7-9e24-4b9e53fd4fd7.png)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/337#issuecomment-327103388

Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2017 08:10:28 UTC