Re: [w3c/touch-events] "List of TouchEvent types" contains requirements (#84)

Naive question: could the section be made normative as is (with the change to MUST)? Or is it currently too vague for that? /cc @RByers 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/touch-events/issues/84#issuecomment-327104472

Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2017 08:15:20 UTC