Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Repurposing the is="" attribute to allow multiple behaviors to be attached to a given element (#662)

@wiredearp @jimmont I think you guys missed the part in which I mentioned an alternate name might be better considering `is=""` already exists and does what it does:

> As an idea to prevent possible confusion with the existing natively-implemented `is=""` in some browsers, this attribute might be named something else, f.e. maybe `components=""`, which is nice, but more typing. Maybe `comps` for short? Etc. `is=""` is still nicest.
> 
> ```html
> <table>
>   <tr components="foo lorem">...</tr>
> </table>
> ```
> 
> `is=""` is still the nicest because it is short and simple.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/662#issuecomment-327680088