- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 15:00:09 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 2 September 2017 15:00:43 UTC
I guess it would be good to study precedent. Perhaps both is what we want. I do think there's value to having a mixin named `DocumentOrShadowRoot` and being able to extend that. It conveys the concept of shared functionality between `Document` and `ShadowRoot` much more clearly than a bunch of `partial interface Document, ShadowRoot` would. The latter seems more accidental somehow. Similar for other mixins in DOM, such as `ParentNode`. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/363#issuecomment-326749330
Received on Saturday, 2 September 2017 15:00:43 UTC