Re: [whatwg/url] Add a neato informative table of various URL pieces (#337)

I think so, although maybe a table is better as that would be more accessible I suspect. Note also that `?` is not part of the `pathname` getter. The other thing that might be interesting is to illustrate a couple different URLs. In particular different schemes. You also omitted the origin field although that's rather hard given that it needs to skip user/pass somehow.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/337#issuecomment-327091998