- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 02:34:54 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 2 September 2017 02:35:20 UTC
That seems like a reasonable approach. The one drawback with it is that if you have an entire mixin that should all have on exposure set, which doesn't match the exposure set of the whole interface, you have to annotate each thing in the mixin individually. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/363#issuecomment-326716803
Received on Saturday, 2 September 2017 02:35:20 UTC