Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebAssembly Response API / Web Embedding (#167)

Taken up at Nice F2F.

@lukewagner Thank you for elaborating. And apologies for the delayed response from our side. So one of the bits that we would like to see is this being either integrated as part of a existing spec for a final review pass (web.md isn't quite something that can be considered a spec) - especially for the JS API parts.

The design bits I believe we are happy with how it looks and it seems like the major concerns we have raised have been addressed. (Although I am still curious about the compile errors, but that is more of a personal curiosity)

Could you update us when you have the JS APIs formulated as a spec?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/167#issuecomment-332240043