- From: Gary Kacmarcik <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 21:30:25 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 18 September 2017 21:31:26 UTC
An argument for keeping something like `request()`: One place where I would like to use `request()` is with the clipboard API. (1) We would like to have a Permission that protects receiving the `clipboardchange` event (since even though the event doesn't contain clipboard data, it might still reveal info about the user). The obvious approach would be to use `request()` and once it is granted, then the events will start being sent. (2) We've also had a request for separate "read" and "write" permissions. But without an entry-point that allows requesting "full" access, there will be multiple independent permission checks that might lead to user interaction: once for reading, once for writing and a separate time for listening ("clipboardchange"). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/83#issuecomment-330362220
Received on Monday, 18 September 2017 21:31:26 UTC