- From: Bede Overend <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:46:44 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2017 07:47:10 UTC
@annevk that sounds completely fair. What if, rather than specifying a particular mixin syntax or anything, we could just open up and generalise the Element Upgrade process - so that we could upgrade new prototypes as we needed? Realise this is touching on #620, which is closed due to existence of `setPrototypeOf` / `__proto__` but as noted, they ruin engine optimisations, and this idea of dynamic Element Upgrades would also include lifecycle hooks e.g. connected / disconnected etc. I'm not sure if implementing it natively would fix those engine optimisation issues...? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/663#issuecomment-327717546
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2017 07:47:10 UTC