Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611)

> Let's play this out as a straw person... we might need it to do the conversion dance that Anne described in #611 (comment) ... what are you thinking @tobie?

So @marcoscaceres, currently, if we want to turn JSON into WebIDL, we have to do JSON.parse(json) -> ES -> WebIDL. We could instead describe bindings for each of JSON 7(?) types, including camelCasing snake_case object properties. This could even nicely mirror the toJSON stuff we recently added.

That said, it's only really worth doing if there are other parts of the platform that would benefit.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/611#issuecomment-332764368