- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 21:29:08 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2017 21:29:34 UTC
The purpose of the distinction is that the CSSWG typically defines the actual CSS thing, and when necessary, the host language fills in whatever language-specific details are required. This distinction isn't theoretical wankery; SVG and HTML define things separately sometimes (or at least did in the past). But there's nothing theoretically wrong with another spec defining a pseudo-class, so long as it has enough visibility for the correct implementors to know about it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/665#issuecomment-327932412
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2017 21:29:34 UTC