- From: Philip Jägenstedt <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 07:39:26 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2017 14:39:51 UTC
Checking back in on this, seeing if I can be of service :) > Preserving unknown parameters. I think this would be much better for a generic URL scheme Per https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/579#issuecomment-328098465 Firefox already preserves them, so that seems likely to be web compatible. What does Edge do? I was trying things like `new URL('data:text/Plain;foo=bar,pla').toString()` but that can't be the right thing, Chrome also preserves that `foo=bar`. > Maybe we should just drop parameters that don't have a value? That or behaving as if they're the empty string seems fine? What do implementations do? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/579#issuecomment-332543229
Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2017 14:39:51 UTC