public-lod@w3.org from February 2009 by date

Saturday, 28 February 2009

• Re: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Kingsley Idehen
• Re: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Kingsley Idehen
• Re: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Juan Sequeda
• Re: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Kingsley Idehen
• Contd: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Kingsley Idehen
• Re: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Dan Brickley
• Re: AW: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Kingsley Idehen
• Re: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Joshua Tauberer
• Re: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Ivan Herman
• AW: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Chris Bizer

Friday, 27 February 2009

• Re: New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Kingsley Idehen
• New LOD Cloud - Please send us links to missing data sources Anja Jentzsch
• Re: wordnet links in DBpedia David Baxter
• RE: wordnet links in DBpedia Georgi Kobilarov
• Virtuoso LOD hosting instance update Kingsley Idehen

Thursday, 26 February 2009

• Re: GeoNames and Spatial Queries Kingsley Idehen
• Re: GeoNames and Spatial Queries Christopher St John
• Re: GeoNames and Spatial Queries Kingsley Idehen
• Re: GeoNames and Spatial Queries Christopher St John
• wordnet links in DBpedia David Baxter
• Fwd: DERI Pipes 0.6.5 available Giovanni Tummarello

Tuesday, 24 February 2009

• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Blake Shepard

Wednesday, 25 February 2009

• RE: GeoNames and Spatial Queries John Goodwin
• DBpedia Archive now part of Amazon Public Data Sets Kingsley Idehen
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Mike Bergman

Tuesday, 24 February 2009

• GeoNames and Spatial Queries Christopher St John
• Best Practices for OWL and LOD John Goodwin

Monday, 23 February 2009

• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet David Baxter
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Mike Bergman
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Dan Brickley
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Mike Bergman
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Hugh Glaser
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Frederick Giasson
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Dan Brickley
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Dan Brickley
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Dan Brickley
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Frederick Giasson
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Juan Sequeda
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Danny Ayers
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Matthias Samwald
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Danny Ayers
• Re: owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet Dan Brickley
• owl:sameAs links from OpenCyc to WordNet David Baxter

Friday, 20 February 2009

• RE: Update re. Virtuoso 6.0 Cluster Edition with LOD Cloud Hosting Orri Erling
• CFC: Beautiful Ontologies, a special issue of the Applied Ontology Mathieu d'Aquin
• Re: Update re. Virtuoso 6.0 Cluster Edition with LOD Cloud Hosting Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Update re. Virtuoso 6.0 Cluster Edition with LOD Cloud Hosting Giovanni Tummarello

Thursday, 19 February 2009

• Update re. Virtuoso 6.0 Cluster Edition with LOD Cloud Hosting Kingsley Idehen
• ANN: D2R Server and D2RQ V0.6 released. Chris Bizer
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Yves Raimond
• Open Knowledge Conference (OKCon) 2009: London, 28th March 2009 Jonathan Gray

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Dan Brickley
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Simon Reinhardt

Tuesday, 17 February 2009

• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Yves Raimond
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Dan Brickley
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Hugh Glaser
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Yves Raimond
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Yves Raimond
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Simon Reinhardt
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Dan Brickley
• MusicBrainzRe: : Where is the linkage? Simon Reinhardt
• Announcing OpenLink Virtuoso, Open-Source Edition, v5.0.10 Tim Haynes

Monday, 16 February 2009

• Re: : Where is the linkage? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: : Where is the linkage? Hugh Glaser
• : Where is the linkage? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Where is the linkage? Kingsley Idehen

Sunday, 15 February 2009

• Re: [semanticweb] Call for Statement of Interest, AAAI 2009 Spring Symposium - Social Semantic Web: Where Web 2.0 Meets Web 3.0 Jie Bao
• Re: Commonly supported properties Martin Hepp (UniBW)
• Where is the linkage? Hugh Glaser
• LOD Instance Reload (one more time) Kingsley Idehen
• HTTP 4XX and 5XX error documents in RDF? (was: Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Commonly supported properties Richard Cyganiak

Saturday, 14 February 2009

• Re: ANN: OpenLink Data Explorer Update Kingsley Idehen
• ANN: MusicBrainz Linked Data Space AMI is now Live on EC2 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Hugh Glaser
• Re: Commonly supported properties Bob Wyman
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Commonly supported properties Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Commonly supported properties Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Hausenblas, Michael
• Commonly supported properties Jay Luker
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Hugh Glaser
• ANN: DERI Pipes 0.6 Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Hausenblas, Michael

Friday, 13 February 2009

• CFP: Semantic Scripting Challenge at SFSW09 Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes
• Virtuoso Instance and LOD Cloud Hosting Update Kingsley Idehen

Thursday, 12 February 2009

• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Kingsley Idehen
• Re: [ANN] DBpedia Lookup Dan Brickley
• Re: [ANN] DBpedia Lookup Sergio Fernández
• RE: [ANN] DBpedia Lookup Georgi Kobilarov
• Re: [ANN] DBpedia Lookup Matthias Samwald
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Bernhard Haslhofer
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Michael Hausenblas
• Call for Statement of Interest, AAAI 2009 Spring Symposium - Social Semantic Web: Where Web 2.0 Meets Web 3.0 Li Ding

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

• Re: [ANN] DBpedia Lookup Kingsley Idehen
• Quick Tweak to DBpedia Real-time Edition Kingsley Idehen
• ANN: DBpedia Live Extraction Test Server Sebastian Hellmann
• Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] [ANN] DBpedia Lookup Egon Willighagen
• SSSW09: 7th Summer School on Ontological Engineering and the Semantic Web - Preliminary Announcement Mathieu d'Aquin
• Re: SPARQL WSDL Richard Light
• Re: SPARQL WSDL Richard Light
• VoCamp Ibiza 2009 Peter Mika
• Re: SPARQL WSDL Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

• [CFP] Semantics for the Rest of Us Workshop (SemRUs 09) at WWW09 in Madrid Lalana Kagal
• Re: [ANN] DBpedia Lookup Giovanni Tummarello
• SPARQL WSDL Richard Light
• [ANN] DBpedia Lookup Georgi Kobilarov
• SemAst09 - final call for participation Norman Gray
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Ed Summers

Monday, 9 February 2009

• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Michael Lang(Jr.)
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Simon Reinhardt
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Semantics-ProjectParadigm
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Hugh Glaser
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Semantics-ProjectParadigm
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Michael Lang(Jr.)
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Juan Sequeda
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Andreas Langegger
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Juan Sequeda
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Juan Sequeda
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Hugh Glaser
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Juan Sequeda
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Andreas Langegger
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Kurt J
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Andreas Langegger
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Juan Sequeda
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Yves Raimond
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Andreas Langegger
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Juan Sequeda
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Jens Lehmann
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Rob Styles
• RE: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Georgi Kobilarov
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Juan Sequeda
• RE: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Georgi Kobilarov
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Juan Sequeda
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Andreas Langegger
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu Kingsley Idehen
• Classical Music Navigator data set Kurt J
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Hugh Glaser
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Hugh Glaser
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Andreas Langegger
• Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Giovanni Tummarello
• Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?) Yves Raimond
• Re: About a network infrastructure Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: About a network infrastructure Andreas Langegger

Sunday, 8 February 2009

• About a network infrastructure Luciano Bernardes de Paula

Monday, 9 February 2009

• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Richard Cyganiak

Sunday, 8 February 2009

• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Kingsley Idehen
• RE: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Andraz Tori
• RE: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Georgi Kobilarov
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Michael Hausenblas
• RE: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Georgi Kobilarov

Saturday, 7 February 2009

• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Hugh Glaser
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Yves Raimond
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Hugh Glaser
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? David Baxter
• Re: DBpedia Lookup RE: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: DBpedia Lookup RE: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Bradley Allen
• RE: DBpedia Lookup RE: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Georgi Kobilarov
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Michael Hausenblas
• DBpedia Lookup RE: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Georgi Kobilarov
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Yves Raimond
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Andraz Tori
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Hugh Glaser
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? David Baxter
• Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Yves Raimond
• Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? Hugh Glaser

Thursday, 5 February 2009

• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Hugh Glaser
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Michael Hausenblas
• Broken Links in LOD Data Sets Bernhard Haslhofer

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

• Re: DBpedia and the BBC Kingsley Idehen
• Re: DBpedia and the BBC (was: RE: studies about LD visibility) Alexandre Passant
• 2nd CFP IRMLeS'09: 1st Int. Workshop on Inductive Reasoning and Machine Learning on the Semantic Web Agnieszka Lawrynowicz
• Re: [ANN] Standard Thesaurus Economics in RDFa/SKOS (tech preview) Benjamin O'Steen
• AW: [ANN] Standard Thesaurus Economics in RDFa/SKOS (tech preview) Neubert Joachim
• AW: [ANN] Standard Thesaurus Economics in RDFa/SKOS (tech preview) Neubert Joachim
• Re: [ANN] Standard Thesaurus Economics in RDFa/SKOS (tech preview) Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

• Re: Minting URIs is bad? David Wood
• Re: DBpedia and the BBC Kingsley Idehen
• IR-KR2009 @ IJCAI-09 - Call for Papers Andraz Tori
• DBpedia and the BBC (was: RE: studies about LD visibility) Georgi Kobilarov
• RE: Minting URIs is bad? Chris Sizemore
• Re: Minting URIs is bad? Dan Brickley
• iMDB in the linked data cloud? was: Minting URIs is bad? Chris Sizemore
• Re: Minting URIs is bad? Leigh Dodds
• Re: Minting URIs is bad? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Minting URIs is bad? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Minting URIs is bad? Hugh Glaser
• Re: Minting URIs is bad? Richard Cyganiak

Monday, 2 February 2009

• [ANN] Standard Thesaurus Economics in RDFa/SKOS (tech preview) Neubert Joachim
• Re: Minting URIs is bad? Dan Brickley
• Re: voiD 1.0 guide comments Jiri Prochazka
• Re: [call for comments] voiD 1.0 Gregory Williams
• Re: voiD 1.0 guide comments Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Minting URIs is bad? (was: Re: [call for comments] voiD 1.0) Peter Ansell
• Minting URIs is bad? (was: Re: [call for comments] voiD 1.0) Richard Cyganiak

Sunday, 1 February 2009

• Re: [call for comments] voiD 1.0 Kingsley Idehen
• voiD 1.0 guide comments Jiri Prochazka
• Re: [call for comments] voiD 1.0 Sergio Fernández

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:21:21 UTC