- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:19:35 -0500
- To: Andreas Langegger <al@jku.at>
- CC: Rob Styles <rob.styles@talis.com>, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, Georgi Kobilarov <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de>, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, public-lod@w3.org
On 2/9/09 9:49 AM, Andreas Langegger wrote: > I also think that this is the most crucial point. We can always say, > well, it's easy, you just need to do this and that. But then comes the > details. But on the other hand, you can do very complex mappings with > D2R already to solve this. The only thing is lack of performance if > you have many obscure mappings for a larger data set! Andreas, Yes, but this doesn't apply to Virtuoso's SPASQL based Meta Schema Language based RDF Views. We don't have the "Union Bomb" vulnerability amongst other things. Links: 1. http://esw.w3.org/topic/Rdb2RdfXG/ReqForMappingByOErling 2. http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/dataspace/dav/wiki/Main/VOSSQL2RDF -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 16:20:34 UTC