- From: Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:26:53 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
In message <49925BCA.6010306@thefigtrees.net>, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> writes > >The SPARQL working group did produce a draft of a WSDL 1.1 definition >of the SPARQL protocol at one point: > >http://www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/ > >However, I am not sure if the protocol defined in this WSDL 1.1 >document is the same as the final SPARQL Protocol Recommendation as >defined in the WSDL 2.0 document. If they are not the same, though, >they should be close enough to get going, I'd imagine. Sorry, Lee, I was being terminally dozy - this is exactly what I needed and imported a treat. (And sorry, Delphi world, someone else is going to have to update the WSDL importer to 2.0!) Richard -- Richard Light
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 08:28:57 UTC