- From: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:08:17 -0600
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>, public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <f914914c0902231108h659b1687g2a37092145a36a9e@mail.gmail.com>
So this does mean that there should be a specialization of rdfs:seeAlso? Juan Sequeda, Ph.D Student Dept. of Computer Sciences The University of Texas at Austin www.juansequeda.com www.semanticwebaustin.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/2/23 Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>: > > > > > >> I thought maybe SKOS [1] might have a suitable term, but alas not. The > >> nearest I can find on a quick vocab skim (see [2]) are variations on > >> 'label', but these are unsuitable not only because they're a bit weak, > >> but also because their range is a literal. So +1 to making up a custom > >> term. > > > > I would suggest using rdfs:seeAlso. I know, I know, usually people > complain > > that rdfs:seeAlso is too generic and demand that the community should > come > > up with some kind of "is quite similar to" predicate (this has been going > on > > for a while now and to my knowledge there are still no serious outcomes). > > true, swag:kindaLike is a good effort from 2001... [1] > > In > > contrast, I would still prefer an established, generic property to > something > > that needs to be invented anew. rdfs:seeAlso is established (which also > > means that people are more likely to re-use it then something you create > in > > your own little namespace), and it is also understood by some existing > > applications. If all of us are starting to create our own "is quite > similar > > to" predicates, we are probably worse off than just using rdfs:seeAlso. > The > > semantics of these "is quite similar to" relations would probably be so > > fuzzy that they would hardly be any more precise and useful than > > rdfs:seeAlso, anyways. > > There does seem to be a considerably more precise correspondence > between Cyc concepts and WordNet terms than rdfs:seeAlso describes. > > But taking your point of what existing applications understand, > perhaps it might make sense to use rdfs:seeAlso in parallel with a > custom term? > > Cheers, > Danny. > > [1] http://infomesh.net/n3/2001-05-util.n3 > > -- > http://danny.ayers.name > >
Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 19:08:52 UTC