- From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:45:26 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>, public-lod@w3.org
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > Simon Reinhardt wrote: >> >> Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> >>> Don't really know how you could expect me to be associated with output >>> that wasn't Linked Data in the purest sense. I am not an isolationist :-) >>> >>> Have you looked at what has been produced? >> >> I'm sorry, I take everything back! :-) > > LOL!! >> >> Looking at >> http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/dataspace/dav/wiki/Main/VirtEC2AMIMusicBrainzInstall >> right now, so you do have your own dereferenceable URIs. I guess I got >> confused when you said: >> >>> We have a new cut as per my mail about MusicBrainz and EC2, and it is >>> based on MusicBrainz URIs. >> >> I took that to mean you're using MB URIs. But I guess what you meant was >> that you use the MB UUIDs to construct your URIs. > > Yes. > > One thing we will add is an owl:sameAs link to the actual MB UUIDs so that > we mesh naturally should Linked Data every come out of their domain. >> >> And I see that it's directly based on the dbtune data. Nice! > Indeed - that's really nice :-) Kingsey, btw, is there a SPARQL end point for Musicbrainz available as part of that work? The DBTune one seems to have quite a few users, but I think I ll redirect them to yours if there is one, as our end point is fairly slow. Also, do you keep in sync with Musicbrainz data? Or do you work on a DB dump? Cheers, y > Of course :-) > > We just need to get linkage sorted re. DBpedia (which has some older Zitgist > URI based links). > > Kingsley >> >> Simon >> >> > > > -- > > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 22:46:02 UTC