- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:47:12 -0500
- To: Robert Kaye <rob@eorbit.net>
- CC: music-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Robert Kaye wrote: > > On Feb 17, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >> (should they someday publish RDF based Linked Data). > > > We have been publishing RDF data since 2001 and its really hurt our > adoption rate early on, so we switched to XML which has enjoyed a > great take-up: > > http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=374 > > Take a look at the RDF vs XML lines in the traffic graph. Given that, > I've been weary of putting any more energy into any RDF based > solution. However, if someone would like to contribute more modern RDF > support, I would very much consider including that support into > MusicBrainz. I just can't justify spending our very few resources > working on RDF related projects. :-( I am sure an number of us will help. The drinks are absolutely on you when you see that graph trend skews towards those de-referencable URIs form your domain. Remember, this race is a marathon not a sprint :-) Kingsley > > -- > > --ruaok A village in Texas has its idiot back! > > Robert Kaye -- rob@eorbit.net -- http://mayhem-chaos.net > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2009 23:47:58 UTC