- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:05:28 +0000
- To: Georgi Kobilarov <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de>
- CC: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Georgi, Great news indeed, thanks for letting us know. Now also available as an ubiquity [1] command at [2]. Cheers, Michael [1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Labs/Ubiquity [2] http://gist.github.com/59915 -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Georgi Kobilarov <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de> > Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:18:35 +0100 > To: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Linked Data community > <public-lod@w3.org> > Subject: DBpedia Lookup RE: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? > Resent-From: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:19:30 +0000 > > >> dbpedia: wanted Tim again. After clicking on a few web pages, none of >> which >> seemed to provide a search facility, I resorted to my usual method:- >> look it >> up in wikipedia and then hack the URI and hope it works in dbpedia. >> (Sorry to name specific sites, guys, but I needed a few examples. >> And I am only asking for a little more, so that the fruits of your >> amazing >> labours can be more widely appreciated!) > > oh, it was my laziness that kept me from announcing it publically yet, > but since Hugh is complaining about the lack of URI search functionality > in DBpedia, here it is: > > http://lookup.dbpedia.org > > and web service at http://lookup.dbpedia.org/api/search.asmx > > KeywordSearch method is for searching full titles, PrefixSearch is for > auto-completion style search. If you want to use that in a productive > system (i.e. putting high load on my server), please drop me a message. > > Best, > Georgi > > -- > Georgi Kobilarov > Freie Universität Berlin > www.georgikobilarov.com > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-lod-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lod-request@w3.org] On >> Behalf Of Hugh Glaser >> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 2:24 PM >> To: public-lod@w3.org >> Subject: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)? >> >> >> My proposal: >> *We should not permit any site to be a member of the Linked Data cloud >> if it >> does not provide a simple way of finding URIs from natural language >> identifiers.* >> >> Rationale: >> One aspect of our Linking Data (not to mention our Linking Open Data) >> world >> is that we want people to link to our data - that is, I have published >> some >> stuff about something, with a URI, and I want people to be able to use >> that >> URI. >> >> So my question to you, the publisher, is: "How easy is it for me to >> find the >> URI your users want?" >> >> My experience suggests it is not always very easy. >> What is required at the minimum, I suggest, is a text search, so that >> if I >> have a (boring string version of a) name that refers in my mind to >> something, I can hope to find an (exciting Linked Data) URI of that >> thing. >> I call this a projection from the Web to the Semantic Web. >> rdfs:label or equivalent usually provides the other one. >> >> At the risk of being seen as critical of the amazing efforts of all my >> colleagues (if not also myself), this is rarely an easy thing to do. >> >> Some recent experiences: >> OpenCalais: as in my previous message on this list, I tried hard to >> find a >> URI for Tim, but failed. >> dbtune: Saw a Twine message about dbtune, trundled over there, and >> tried to >> find a URI for a Telemann, but failed. >> dbpedia: wanted Tim again. After clicking on a few web pages, none of >> which >> seemed to provide a search facility, I resorted to my usual method:- >> look it >> up in wikipedia and then hack the URI and hope it works in dbpedia. >> (Sorry to name specific sites, guys, but I needed a few examples. >> And I am only asking for a little more, so that the fruits of your >> amazing >> labours can be more widely appreciated!) >> wordnet: [2] below >> >> So I have access to Linked Data sites that I know (or at least > strongly >> suspect) have URIs I might want, but I can't find them. >> How on earth do we expect your average punter to join this world? >> >> What have I missed? >> Searching, such as Sindice: Well yes, but should I really have to go >> off to >> a search engine to find a dbpedia URI? And when I look up "Telemann >> dbtune" >> I don't get any results. And I wanted the dbtune link, not some other >> link. >> Did I miss some links on web pages? Quite probably, but the basic >> problem >> still stands. >> SPARQL: Well, yes. But we cannot seriously expect our users to >> formulate a >> SPARQL query simply to find out the dbpedia URI for Tim. What is the >> regexp >> I need to put in? (see below [1]) >> A foaf file: Well Tim's dbpedia URI is probably in his foaf file >> (although >> possibly there are none of Tim's URIs in his foaf file), if I can >> actually >> find the file; but for some reason I can't seem to find Telemann's > foaf >> file. >> >> If you are still doubting me, try finding a URI for Telemann in > dbpedia >> without using an external link, just by following stuff from the home >> page. >> I managed to get a Telemann by using SPARQL without a regexp (it times >> out >> on any regexp), but unfortunately I get the asteroid. >> >> Again, my proposal: >> *We should not permit any site to be a member of the Linked Data cloud >> if it >> does not provide a simple way of finding URIs from natural language >> identifiers.* >> Otherwise we end up in a silo, and the world passes us by. >> >> Very best >> Hugh >> >> [And since we have to take our own medicine, I have added a "Just >> search" >> box right at the top level of all the rkbexplorer.com domains, such as >> http://wordnet.rkbexplorer.com/ ] >> >> >> [1] >> Dbtune finding of Telemann: >> SELECT * WHERE {?s ?p ?name . >> FILTER regex(?name, "Telemann$") } >> >> I tried >> SELECT * WHERE {?s ?p ?name . >> FILTER regex(?name, "telemann$", "i") } >> first, but got no results - not sure why. >> >> [2] >> <rant> >> I cannot believe just how frustrating this stuff can be when you > really >> try >> to use it. >> Because I looked at Sindice for telemann, I know that it is a word in >> wordnet ( http://sindice.com/search?q=Telemann reports loads of >> http://wordnet.rkbexplorer.com/ links). >> Great, he thinks, I can get a wordnet link from a "proper" wordnet >> publisher >> (ie not me). >> Goes to >> > http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpen >> Data >> to find wordnet. >> The link there is dead. >> Strips off the last bit, to get to the home princeton wordnet page, > and >> clicks on the browser link I find - also dead. >> Go back and look on the >> > http://esw.w3.org/topic/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData/Da >> taSet >> s page, and find the link to http://esw.w3.org/topic/WordNet , but > that >> doesn't help. >> So finally, I do the obvious - google "wordnet rdf". >> Of course I get lots of pages saying how available it is, and how >> exciting >> it is that we have it, and how it was produced; and somewhere in there >> I >> find a link: "Wordnet-RDF/RDDL Browser" at >> www.openhealth.org/RDDL/wnbrowse >> Almost unable to contain myself with excitement, I click on the link > to >> find >> a text box, and with trembling hands I type "Telemann" and click >> submit. >> If I show you what I got, you can come some way to imagining my >> devastation: >> "Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser >> Exception net.sf.saxon.trans.DynamicError: >> org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: >> White spaces are required between publicId and systemId. >> org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: White spaces are required between >> publicId >> and systemId." >> >> Does the emperor have any clothes at all? >> </rant> > >
Received on Saturday, 7 February 2009 16:06:15 UTC