- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:16:13 +0100
- To: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, Robert Kaye <rob@eorbit.net>, music-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com
On 17/2/09 23:41, Yves Raimond wrote: > Hello! > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Dan Brickley<danbri@danbri.org> wrote: >> +cc: Robert, Yves >> >> On 17/2/09 21:52, Simon Reinhardt wrote: >>> Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>>> We have a new Musicbrainz dump, and it will be integrated into DBpedia >>>> (I think Georgi is working on this). There will soon be a publicdump >>>> available to others in the coming days. >>> Did you consider working with Yves? He spent a lot of time mapping >>> MusicBrainz' Advanced Relationships to Music Ontology terms already. >>> Personally I'd prefer if there was a combined effort and *one* mapping >>> of MB into LOD to make things more consistent. Also having >>> dereferencable URIs would be nice (which is never going to happen if you >>> use MB's URIs, given how excited Robert Kaye is about RDF - not). >>> >>> Regards, >>> Simon >> >> Well, you never know. Why not ask again? :) >> >> Robert - do you have any plans for "perma-link"-style per artist, per album >> etc. pages at MusicBrainz, which might become canonical reference URLs for >> the things they describe? (ie. with nice stable URLs). If so, could you be >> persuaded to include RDFa markup inline in the HTML pages, so the content >> could be machine-readable too? (or even rdf/xml at a nearby shadow URL). If >> not, fair enough, there are various candidate services who will probably do >> something like this. But my preference would be for the identifiers and data >> to come direct from MusicBrainz if possible. Any thoughts? Yves too, any >> thoughts on best way forward? > > Actually, I have some stale code for mb_server from about 6 month ago > to provide RDF representations of Musicbrainz artist URIs (well, > that's a start...). I really need to start working on that again, but > I definitely hope we can have Linked Data directly at Musicbrainz, at > some point! Things are beginning to look a bit better on my backlog, > so hopefully I can revive that work soonish. > > RDFa would be good option!! (/me ashamed to not have thought about it :-( ) Ah, this would be great! Hope you get time to hack on this soon. If you need reviewers, help etc., don't hesitate to ask around... cheers, Dan -- http://danbri.org/
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 23:17:10 UTC