- From: Kurt J <kurtjx@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:03:00 +0000
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Hi List, IMHO, the discussion about incentives v. costs is really interesting. Publishing linked data is getting easier as better tools become available. As a relative new comer, i can already get a sense about this. But maybe we need to be more clear about the incentives. I'm not sure if this means more/better evangelist style documents or maybe it means some killer end-user app or some combination. What is out there to explain the incentives? -kurt On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Andreas Langegger <al@jku.at> wrote: > >> It seems to me that the data in an rdbms is often structured in ways that >> are designed to be efficient for the rdbms to manage rather than in ways >> that make sense externally. Levels of normalisation are the main thing I'm >> thinking of. LD is most widely useful at 5th Normal Form, but then there are >> tradeoffs that usually lead to an rdbms schema being more like 3NF. > > I also think that this is the most crucial point. We can always say, well, > it's easy, you just need to do this and that. But then comes the details. > But on the other hand, you can do very complex mappings with D2R already to > solve this. The only thing is lack of performance if you have many obscure > mappings for a larger data set! > >> Isn't the effort in publishing LD the same effort that one expends getting >> the data from the rdbms into HTML today, but that the data needs to be in >> RDF? When doing that don't tradeoffs in the schema have to be reconciled >> through queries that join from several tables or that select distinct >> entries in particular columns? Isn't that what Drupal and Ruby-n-Rails and >> so on are optimised to do? >> >> I agree with the notion of lowering the barrier and Virtuoso's mapping >> stuff is really interesting, but is the cost really that high right now? >> Isn't it just the same as writing some dynamic web pages? > > I think it depends if you just want to provide some RDFa pages, or if you > want to provide SPARQL. In the second case, you have to do a formalized > mapping (e.g. with d2rq map or Virtuoso RDF views) > > > > >> >> >> rob >> >> >> Rob Styles >> tel: +44 (0)870 400 5000 >> fax: +44 (0)870 400 5001 >> mobile: +44 (0)7971 475 257 >> msn: mmmmmrob@yahoo.com >> irc: irc.freenode.net/mmmmmrob,isnick >> web: http://www.talis.com/ >> blog: http://www.dynamicorange.com/blog/ >> blog: http://blogs.talis.com/panlibus/ >> blog: http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/ >> blog: http://blogs.talis.com/n2/ >> Please consider the environment before printing this email. >> >> Find out more about Talis at www.talis.com >> shared innovationTM >> >> Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be >> those of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of this email >> message and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the >> usage of the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, >> then please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this >> e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited. >> >> Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is >> registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights >> Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB. >> > > > http://www.langegger.at > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dipl.-Ing.(FH) Andreas Langegger > Institute for Applied Knowledge Processing > Johannes Kepler University Linz > A-4040 Linz, Altenberger Straße 69 > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 15:03:40 UTC