Wednesday, 31 March 2021
- Closed: [dxwg] foaf:homepage vs. dcat:landingPage (#352)
- Re: [dxwg] foaf:homepage vs. dcat:landingPage (#352)
- Closed: [dxwg] Digest for DCAT distributions (#1287)
- Re: [dxwg] Digest for DCAT distributions (#1287)
- Closed: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- dxwg-ACTION-442: Address https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1341 by switching to iris
Tuesday, 30 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Add on ODRL Policy Example (#1333)
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] Add on ODRL Policy Example (#1333)
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] Add on ODRL Policy Example (#1333)
- Re: [dxwg] Add on ODRL Policy Example (#1333)
- Re: [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020)
- Closed: [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020)
- Re: [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT2.ttl: Request for minor changes (#1246)
- Re: [dxwg] Add on ODRL Policy Example (#1333)
- Re: [dxwg] Add on ODRL Policy Example (#1333)
Monday, 29 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - DDI alignment (profile) (#164)
- DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 31 March 2021 20:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT2.ttl: Request for minor changes (#1246)
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] Add on ODRL Policy Example (#1333)
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] Add adms:last, adms:next, adms:prev to dcat:Resource (#1340)
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] Add adms:last, adms:next, adms:prev to dcat:Resource (#1340)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT2.ttl: Request for minor changes (#1246)
- Re: [dxwg] Should any DCAT predicates be registered as IANA relations? (#946)
- Re: [dxwg] Add adms:last, adms:next, adms:prev to dcat:Resource (#1340)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Add on ODRL Policy Example (#1333)
- Re: [dxwg] Scope of DCAT - datasets, or digital descriptions (#1235)
Sunday, 28 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] should DCAT 3 provide its own way to indicate the query to pose to the data service endpoints? (#1230)
- Re: [dxwg] Axiom binding the properties dcat:servesDataset and dcat:accessService (#1227)
- Re: [dxwg] Should any DCAT predicates be registered as IANA relations? (#946)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case for "wasGeneratedBy" and for rate (#726)
- Re: [dxwg] Hydra example for DCAT documentation/primer (#648)
- Re: [dxwg] foaf:homepage vs. dcat:landingPage (#352)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: Distinguish query and item access semantics [RDISA] (#145)
- Re: [dxwg] distribution > dcat:accessURL (#1334)
- Re: [dxwg] Should dct:conformsTo point to a specific version of a specification? (#1338)
- Re: [dxwg] definitions clarifications of conforms to (#1130)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - Datacite alignment (profile) (#152)
- Re: [dxwg] Minor editorial comments on DCAT CR candidate (#1020)
- Re: [dxwg] Collate existing practice in use of dct:conformsTo with DCAT (#1225)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
Saturday, 27 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add adms:last, adms:next, adms:prev to dcat:Resource
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add adms:last, adms:next, adms:prev to dcat:Resource
- Re: [dxwg] Digest for DCAT distributions (#1287)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: Dataset size characteristics (#161)
- Closed: [dxwg] Use case: Dataset size characteristics (#161)
- Re: [dxwg] Add on ODRL Policy Example (#1333)
- Re: [dxwg] Add examples to DCAT section on licences and rights (#676)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add examples in licensing section
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add examples in licensing section
Friday, 26 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT2.ttl: Request for minor changes (#1246)
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue 1246 (#1337)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT2.ttl: Request for minor changes (#1246)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT2.ttl: Request for minor changes (#1246)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT2.ttl: Request for minor changes (#1246)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- Re: [dxwg] Collate existing practice in use of dct:conformsTo with DCAT (#1225)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
- [dxwg] Should dct:conformsTo point to a specific version of a specification? (#1338)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
Thursday, 25 March 2021
- Re: dxwg-ACTION-440: Reply to points 3 and 4 of https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1246
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT2.ttl: Request for minor changes (#1246)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat issue 1246
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat issue 1246
Wednesday, 24 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? (#1335)
- Re: [dxwg] Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? (#1335)
- Re: [dxwg] Applying PROV's lightweight approach for DCAT inverse properties (#1336)
- Re: [dxwg] Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? (#1335)
- Re: [dxwg] Applying PROV's lightweight approach for DCAT inverse properties (#1336)
- Re: [dxwg] Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? (#1335)
Tuesday, 23 March 2021
- dxwg-ACTION-441: to get report on ietf situation for conneg-p from lars & ruben
- Re: [dxwg] Applying PROV's lightweight approach for DCAT inverse properties (#1336)
- Re: [dxwg] Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? (#1335)
- Re: DXWG Meeting: 2021-03-23 - 21:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? (#1335)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
- Closed: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Closed: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- [dxwg] Applying PROV's lightweight approach for DCAT inverse properties (#1336)
Monday, 22 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? (#1335)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series and inheritance (#1273)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series v2 (issue 1272) (#1292)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by andrea-perego
- Re: [dxwg] Add distribution digest (#1323)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series v2 (issue 1272) (#1292)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series v2 (issue 1272) (#1292)
- DXWG Meeting: 2021-03-23 - 21:00 UTC
- [dxwg] Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? (#1335)
- Re: [dxwg] Predicate to link from Distribution to Dataset (#1322)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Add on ODRL Policy Example (#1333)
- [dxwg] distribution > dcat:accessURL (#1334)
- Re: [dxwg] Review of DCAT conformance statement (#1332)
- [dxwg] Add on ODRL Policy Example (#1333)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dcterms:identifier` (#771)
Sunday, 21 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
Saturday, 20 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dcterms:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430)
- [dxwg] Review of DCAT conformance statement (#1332)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dcterms:identifier` (#771)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update usage note for 'identifier'
- Re: [dxwg] Add distribution digest (#1323)
- Re: [dxwg] Add distribution digest (#1323)
- Closed: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277)
- [dxwg] Should DCAT be more explicit on releases? (#1331)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - CSMD/ICAT alignment (profile) (#302)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT - CSMD/ICAT alignment (profile) (#302)
- Closed: [dxwg] Non-English labels and comments (#174)
- Re: [dxwg] Non-English labels and comments (#174)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: Dataset size characteristics (#161)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - HCLS alignment (profile) (#150)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT - HCLS alignment (profile) (#150)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT - DATS alignment (profile) (#149)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - DATS alignment (profile) (#149)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT 2014 profile of DCAT (#144)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 2014 profile of DCAT (#144)
- Closed: [dxwg] Test datasets for revised DCAT vocabulary (#137)
- Re: [dxwg] Test datasets for revised DCAT vocabulary (#137)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Closed: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Closed: [dxwg] Examples of quality for services (#252)
- Re: [dxwg] Examples of quality for services (#252)
- Closed: [dxwg] Aligning ADMS with DCAT (#113)
- Re: [dxwg] Aligning ADMS with DCAT (#113)
- Closed: [dxwg] Erratum: in DCAT 1.0 RDF dcat:keyword is a sub-property of dct:subject (#175)
- Re: [dxwg] Erratum: in DCAT 1.0 RDF dcat:keyword is a sub-property of dct:subject (#175)
- Re: [dxwg] Generalize dcat:byteSize to dcat:size (#313)
- Closed: [dxwg] Generalize dcat:byteSize to dcat:size (#313)
- Closed: [dxwg] Clarify if DCAT's use of ProfileDesc (#393)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify if DCAT's use of ProfileDesc (#393)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT-Rev profile to simulate 2014/DCAT-AP (#499)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT-Rev profile to simulate 2014/DCAT-AP (#499)
- Closed: [dxwg] Use case: modeling permissions, obligations, prohibitions (#224)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: modeling permissions, obligations, prohibitions (#224)
- Re: [dxwg] Including more machine-actionable Version Delta? (#1271)
- Closed: [dxwg] Including more machine-actionable Version Delta? (#1271)
- Closed: [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for controlled-access healthcare datasets (#1291)
- Re: [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for controlled-access healthcare datasets (#1291)
Thursday, 18 March 2021
- [Reminder] Call for Exclusions: Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT) - Version 3
- Re: [dxwg] Add distribution digest (#1323)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Add distribution digest (#1323)
- Re: [dxwg] Add distribution digest (#1323)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Add distribution digest (#1323)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
Wednesday, 17 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Add distribution digest (#1323)
- dxwg-ACTION-440: Reply to points 3 and 4 of https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1246
- dxwg-ACTION-439: Create a pr to address points 1 and 2 of https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1246
- [dxwg] DCAT Example 41: need different relation for CRS on spatial locations in dataset. (#1330)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Collate existing practice in use of dct:conformsTo with DCAT (#1225)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
- Re: [dxwg] Collate existing practice in use of dct:conformsTo with DCAT (#1225)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Recommend byteSize typed as an integer (not decimal)
- Re: [dxwg] Collate existing practice in use of dct:conformsTo with DCAT (#1225)
- Re: [dxwg] Removing reference to closed issue 1258 (#1324)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by andrea-perego
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Use sdo:rangeIncludes to guide expectations on properties (#912)
- Re: [dxwg] Use sdo:rangeIncludes to guide expectations on properties (#912)
Tuesday, 16 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Add recommendations on the URIs to be used with dcterms:conformsTo (#1310)
- Re: [dxwg] Add recommendations on the URIs to be used with dcterms:conformsTo (#1310)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series v2 (issue 1272) (#1292)
- DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 17 March 2021 21:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] Add recommendations on the URIs to be used with dcterms:conformsTo (#1310)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series v2 (issue 1272) (#1292)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series v2 (issue 1272) (#1292)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] DatasetSeries: adding dcat:inSeries and its inverse, updating the dataset examples. (#1328)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
Monday, 15 March 2021
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Minor editorial edits in the dcat:Resource section
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Minor editorial edits in the dcat:Resource section
- Re: [dxwg] DatasetSeries: adding dcat:inSeries and its inverse, updating the dataset examples. (#1328)
- Re: [dxwg] DatasetSeries: adding dcat:inSeries and its inverse, updating the dataset examples. (#1328)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] DatasetSeries: adding dcat:inSeries and its inverse, updating the dataset examples. (#1328)
- Re: [dxwg] DatasetSeries: adding dcat:inSeries and its inverse, updating the dataset examples. (#1328)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] DatasetSeries: adding dcat:inSeries and its inverse, updating the dataset examples. (#1328)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
Sunday, 14 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Digest for DCAT distributions (#1287)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can be modular, with a given response made up of more than one module. A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple, modular profiles (#258)
- Re: [dxwg] DatasetSeries: adding dcat:inSeries and its inverse, updating the dataset examples. (#1328)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can be modular, with a given response made up of more than one module. A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple, modular profiles (#258)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset series v2 (issue 1272) (#1292)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: DatasetSeries: adding dcat:inSeries and its inverse, updating the dataset examples.
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Digest for DCAT distributions (#1287)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:byteSize - check constraints (#125)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update charter link
- Re: [dxwg] Use sdo:rangeIncludes to guide expectations on properties (#912)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - DDI alignment (profile) (#164)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Recommend byteSize typed as an integer (not decimal)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update usage note for 'identifier'
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] What is the level of the inheritance link? (#857)
- Closed: [dxwg] New UC - Specification documents with multiple roles (#978)
- Closed: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990)
- Re: [dxwg] Provide a pathway for referencing profiles embedded in documents with broader scope. (#990)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:byteSize - check constraints (#125)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can be modular, with a given response made up of more than one module. A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple, modular profiles (#258)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to Class Diagram (figure 1). (#1320)
- Closed: [dxwg] There need to be an http-based mechanism to point to representations conforming to other profiles [ID30] (5.30) (#266)
- Re: [dxwg] There need to be an http-based mechanism to point to representations conforming to other profiles [ID30] (5.30) (#266)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - DDI alignment (profile) (#164)
Saturday, 13 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Use sdo:rangeIncludes to guide expectations on properties (#912)
- Closed: [dxwg] Add 'Security and privacy' section to all the documents (#460)
- Re: [dxwg] Add 'Security and privacy' section to all the documents (#460)
- Re: [dxwg] Namespace for profiles ontology (and other things?) (#503)
- Closed: [dxwg] Namespace for profiles ontology (and other things?) (#503)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - CSMD/ICAT alignment (profile) (#302)
- Re: [dxwg] There need to be an http-based mechanism to point to representations conforming to other profiles [ID30] (5.30) (#266)
- Re: [dxwg] [profiledesc] role assumes closed world of the document (#262)
- Re: [dxwg] Non-English labels and comments (#174)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - DDI alignment (profile) (#164)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - HCLS alignment (profile) (#150)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - DATS alignment (profile) (#149)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 2014 profile of DCAT (#144)
- Re: [dxwg] Test datasets for revised DCAT vocabulary (#137)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:byteSize - check constraints (#125)
- Closed: [dxwg] Related vocabularies comparision [RVC] (#87)
- Re: [dxwg] Related vocabularies comparision [RVC] (#87)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Closed: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF] (#76)
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF] (#76)
- Re: [dxwg] ID37 Europeana profile ecosystem: representing, publishing and consuming application profiles of the Europeana Data Model (EDM) (#8)
- Re: [dxwg] Updating Data Quality Vocabulary wrt updates in POE (#5)
- Closed: [dxwg] Dataset aspects [RDSAT] (#60)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset aspects [RDSAT] (#60)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: [dxwg] Examples of quality for services (#252)
- Re: [dxwg] Aligning ADMS with DCAT (#113)
- Closed: [dxwg] Publication source [RPS] (#78)
- Re: [dxwg] Publication source [RPS] (#78)
- Re: [dxwg] Erratum: in DCAT 1.0 RDF dcat:keyword is a sub-property of dct:subject (#175)
- Closed: [dxwg] Use Case: Profiles of DCAT-AP and various implementation resources (#238)
- Re: [dxwg] Use Case: Profiles of DCAT-AP and various implementation resources (#238)
- Re: [dxwg] Generalize dcat:byteSize to dcat:size (#313)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify if DCAT's use of ProfileDesc (#393)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT-Rev profile to simulate 2014/DCAT-AP (#499)
- Closed: [dxwg] Add support for errata in Req track documents (e.g. DCAT) (#545)
- Re: [dxwg] Add support for errata in Req track documents (e.g. DCAT) (#545)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
- Closed: [dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
- Re: [dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: modeling permissions, obligations, prohibitions (#224)
- Re: [dxwg] Documenting changes to DCAT classes / properties (#176)
- Closed: [dxwg] Documenting changes to DCAT classes / properties (#176)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we create human-readable documentation for DCAT alignments? (#163)
- Closed: [dxwg] Should we create human-readable documentation for DCAT alignments? (#163)
- Closed: [dxwg] Create a use case that explains the meta modelling requirement for domain/range restrictions on the dcat:contactPoint & other DCAT properties (#130)
- Re: [dxwg] Create a use case that explains the meta modelling requirement for domain/range restrictions on the dcat:contactPoint & other DCAT properties (#130)
- Re: [dxwg] Ensure UC cross-linking (#107)
- Closed: [dxwg] Ensure UC cross-linking (#107)
- Closed: [dxwg] Linking a metadata record to the relevant catalogue(s) (#132)
- Re: [dxwg] Linking a metadata record to the relevant catalogue(s) (#132)
- Re: [dxwg] Including more machine-actionable Version Delta? (#1271)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277)
Friday, 12 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to Class Diagram (figure 1). (#1320)
- Closed: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
Thursday, 11 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Should we turn 'dct' into 'dcterms' also for the GitHub examples? (#1319)
- Re: [dxwg] digest for DCAT distributions (#1287)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add distribution digest
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add distribution digest
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to Class Diagram (figure 1). (#1320)
- Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975)
- Re: [dxwg] Predicate to link from Distribution to Dataset (#1322)
- Re: [dxwg] Monthly DBpedia releases (#1085)
- Re: [dxwg] referencing named graph of endpoint or RDF quad file (#1241)
- Re: [dxwg] Predicate to link from Distribution to Dataset (#1322)
- Re: [dxwg] Monthly DBpedia releases (#1085)
- Re: [dxwg] referencing named graph of endpoint or RDF quad file (#1241)
- [dxwg] Predicate to link from Distribution to Dataset (#1322)
- Re: [dxwg] referencing named graph of endpoint or RDF quad file (#1241)
- Re: [dxwg] better link for ISO19115-1 codelist, section 13 (#975)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: Implementation of DCAT-AP in GeoNetwork (#1054)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Implementation of DCAT-AP in GeoNetwork (#1054)
- Re: [dxwg] Monthly DBpedia releases (#1085)
- Re: [dxwg] Stability of DCAT version URIs (#1128)
- Closed: [dxwg] Stability of DCAT version URIs (#1128)
- Closed: [dxwg] Question: how to catalog relational database data in DCAT? (#1240)
- Re: [dxwg] Question: how to catalog relational database data in DCAT? (#1240)
- Re: [dxwg] Tracking the API bug (mismatch between /TR and API for "vocab-dcat") (#1223)
- Re: [dxwg] referencing named graph of endpoint or RDF quad file (#1241)
- Re: [dxwg] Question: how to catalog relational database data in DCAT? (#1240)
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to Class Diagram (figure 1). (#1320)
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to Class Diagram (figure 1). (#1320)
- Closed: [dxwg] Example 47 seems to be missing relation links (#1285)
- Re: [dxwg] Example 47 seems to be missing relation links (#1285)
- Re: [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for controlled-access healthcare datasets (#1291)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
- Re: [dxwg] Add recommendations on the URIs to be used with dcterms:conformsTo (#1310)
- Re: Doodle for DXWG Plenary Meetings from March 28th until October 10th of 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Add recommendations on the URIs to be used with dcterms:conformsTo (#1310)
- Re: [dxwg] Add recommendations on the URIs to be used with dcterms:conformsTo (#1310)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Add recommendations on the URIs to be used with dcterms:conformsTo (#1310)
- Re: Doodle for DXWG Plenary Meetings from March 28th until October 10th of 2021
- Re: Doodle for DXWG Plenary Meetings from March 28th until October 10th of 2021
Wednesday, 10 March 2021
- Re: Doodle for DXWG Plenary Meetings from March 28th until October 10th of 2021
- Re: Doodle for DXWG Plenary Meetings from March 28th until October 10th of 2021
- [dxwg] Pull Request: replacing title(s) without namespaces with dcterms:title in some examples
- [dxwg] Pull Request: replacing title(s) without namespaces with dcterms:title in some examples
- RE: Doodle for DXWG Plenary Meetings from March 28th until October 10th of 2021
- Re: Doodle for DXWG Plenary Meetings from March 28th until October 10th of 2021
- Re: Doodle for DXWG Plenary Meetings from March 28th until October 10th of 2021
- Re: Doodle for DXWG Plenary Meetings from March 28th until October 10th of 2021
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by andrea-perego
- Closed: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258)
- Re: Doodle for DXWG Plenary Meetings from March 28th until October 10th of 2021
- Doodle for DXWG Plenary Meetings from March 28th until October 10th of 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Changes to Class Diagram (figure 1). (#1320)
- [dxwg] Changes to Class Diagram (figure 1). (#1320)
- Re: [dxwg] Namespace prefix for DC Terms (#1314)
- [dxwg] Should we turn 'dct' into 'dcterms' also for the GitHub examples? (#1319)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Figures format and legibility (#896)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: Figures format and legibility (#896)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section in DCAT3 FPWD (#1295)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update ack section
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Update ack section
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section in DCAT3 FPWD (#1295)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section in DCAT3 FPWD (#1295)
- Re: [dxwg] Scope of spatial and temporal properties (#1253)
- Re: [dxwg] Namespace prefix for DC Terms (#1314)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
- Closed: [dxwg] Namespace prefix for DC Terms (#1314)
- Re: [dxwg] Replacing dct with dcterms in rdf and creating rdf files for DCAT 3 (#1316)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Replacing dct with dcterms in rdf and creating rdf files for DCAT 3
- Re: [dxwg] Replacing dct with dcterms in rdf and creating rdf files for DCAT 3 (#1316)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Closed: [dxwg] Reasons for not adding properties to dcat:Resource (and therefore not to dcat:DataService) (#1317)
- Re: [dxwg] Reasons for not adding properties to dcat:Resource (and therefore not to dcat:DataService) (#1317)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
Tuesday, 9 March 2021
- Re: DXWG Meeting: 2021-03-09 - 20:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] Replacing dct with dcterms in rdf and creating rdf files for DCAT 3 (#1316)
- Re: [dxwg] Reasons for not adding properties to dcat:Resource (and therefore not to dcat:DataService) (#1317)
- [dxwg] Reasons for not adding properties to dcat:DataService (#1317)
- Re: [dxwg] Replacing dct with dcterms in rdf and creating rdf files for DCAT 3 (#1316)
- Re: DXWG Meeting: 2021-03-09 - 20:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] Replacing dct with dcterms in rdf and creating rdf files for DCAT 3 (#1316)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: [dxwg] Replacing dct with dcterms in rdf and creating rdf files for DCAT 3 (#1316)
- Re: DXWG Meeting: 2021-03-09 - 20:00 UTC
- Re: DXWG Meeting: 2021-03-09 - 20:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] Replace dct: with dcterms: (#1315)
- Re: [dxwg] Replacing dct with dcterms in rdf and creating rdf files for DCAT 3 (#1316)
- Re: [dxwg] Replacing dct with dcterms in rdf and creating rdf files for DCAT 3 (#1316)
- Re: [dxwg] Namespace prefix for DC Terms (#1314)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat issue 1314 updating RDF
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Replace dct: with dcterms:
- Re: [dxwg] Namespace prefix for DC Terms (#1314)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Replace dct: with dcterms:
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Closed: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
Monday, 8 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: DXWG Meeting: 2021-03-09 - 20:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- [dxwg] Namespace prefix for DC Terms (#1314)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of locn:geometry (#1293)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
- Closed: [dxwg] Range of locn:geometry (#1293)
- Re: DXWG Meeting: 2021-03-09 - 20:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] Revise section on dataset series as discussed in issue 1272 (#1313)
- Re: [dxwg] Revise section on dataset series as discussed in issue 1272 (#1313)
- Re: [dxwg] Revise section on dataset series as discussed in issue 1272 (#1313)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] digest for DCAT distributions (#1287)
- Re: [dxwg] Integrity property? (#1311)
- Closed: [dxwg] Integrity property? (#1311)
Sunday, 7 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277)
Saturday, 6 March 2021
Friday, 5 March 2021
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Revise section on dataset series as discussed in issue 1272
- Re: DXWG Meeting: 2021-03-09 - 20:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295)
- DXWG Meeting: 2021-03-09 - 20:00 UTC
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
Thursday, 4 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- [dxwg] DCAT files import wrong Dublin Core URL (#1312)
- Re: [dxwg] digest for DCAT distributions (#1287)
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] Integrity property? (#1311)
- [dxwg] Integrity property? (#1311)
- Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)
Wednesday, 3 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT also cover software assets? (#1278)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT also cover software assets? (#1278)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 03 March 2021 21:00 UCT
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
Tuesday, 2 March 2021
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] Notes on reviewing DCAT FPWD (#1275)
- Closed: [dxwg] Notes on reviewing DCAT FPWD (#1275)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272)
- Re: [dxwg] Notes on reviewing DCAT FPWD (#1275)
Monday, 1 March 2021
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add recommendations on the URIs to be used with dct:conformsTo
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Add recommendations on the URIs to be used with dct:conformsTo
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix range of locn:geometry in rdf
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)
- Re: [dxwg] Resource Descriptor -> Profile Resource (#1109)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Closed: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Example 47 seems to be missing relation links (#1285)
- Closed: [dxwg] Example 47 seems to be missing relation links (#1285)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix issue #1285
- Re: [dxwg] Example 47 seems to be missing relation links (#1285)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix issue #1285
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151)
- Re: [dxwg] Two things that our "profiles" are not (#976)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168)