- From: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 20:50:34 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Some discussions about the names of these properties have taken place in PR #1328. I am going to report the gist of the discussions below, as this issue seems to be a better place where to discuss. _Originally posted by @andrea-perego in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1328#issuecomment-798960696_ >For the inverse of `dcat:inSeries` I suggest we use something shorter: `dcat:hasMember`. >Another option for the names of these properties is `dcat:hasParent` / `dcat:hasChild` , following the terminology used in ISO 19115 for dataset series. _Originally posted by @riccardoAlbertoni in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1328#issuecomment-799342620_ >Yes, the names are long. However, I wonder if mentioning 'series' in the property names can help recall and use these properties more coherently. This also considering possible confusion with `dcterms:hasPart` and other parts-related properties. What do you think? _Originally posted by @andrea-perego in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1328#issuecomment-799479445_ >I don't think it's necessary to recall the scope of this property, as it has its own domain (`dcat:DatasetSeries`). For the same reason, including "series" in the property name looks redundant, and I am not very worried about being confused with `dcterms:hasPart`. >However, if the close semantics of "part" and "series" raises concerns on improper use, we should consider other options. >`dcat:hasChild` / `dcat:hasParent` are a good alternative, IMO, and they reflect the hierarchical structure of dataset series, as already mentioned in PR https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1292 and in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1307#issuecomment-799139402 _Originally posted by @riccardoAlbertoni in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1328#issuecomment-799562472_ >Andrea, If you think `dcat:hasSeriesMember` is too long and not acceptable then `dcat:hasMember` will be my choice. >Using `dcat:hasChild` and `dcat:hasParent` helps those familiar with ISO dataset series. However, we target a larger audience. In this target, I suspect people might have different views of what is considered a child of a dataset (potentially, anything originated by a dataset can be considered a 'child'!? and that might be confusing). -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1307#issuecomment-800595335 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2021 20:50:36 UTC