Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)

> > Looking at this thread, I think there's a general agreement on `dcat:inSeries` (which is what is issue was specifically about), but still some concerns on its inverse and other design issues (including those raised by @agreiner ).
> > Therefore, I propose we revise PR #1292 by provisionally removing the inverse of `dcat:inSeries`, and then merge it (it has been around for quite a while, and it is addressing also other issues).
> > For the inverse of `dcat:inSeries` and other discussion topics, we will instead create separate issues, and move the discussion there. This would also help better track the decisions that will be taken on them.
> Yes, I agree with the direction you have suggested. I am going to update the PR and open a new issue accordingly.

 If we do not need to open other issues besides #1335, this issue can be closed as soon as we merge the changes in PR #1292.

GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Monday, 22 March 2021 17:38:39 UTC