- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:30:15 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
andrea-perego has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg: == Should dct:conformsTo point to a specific version of a specification? == Originally posted by @rob-metalinkage in https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1211#issuecomment-799901653 : > @andrea-perego w.r.t. can you shed any light on these: > > https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/metadata-codelist/ProtocolValue > > they reference a sort of "abstract typing" for specific OGC specifications - not the specific implementing versions. > > I suspect that what they really do implicitly is reference an INSPIRE profile of a particular version of a standard, as defined in some out of band rules or guidance. > > If there is something that can be added to the very plain objects being referenced at the OGC - maybe a comment or something, we can run this past the OGC NamingAuthority and update it. > > For example INSPIRE profiles described using PROF could be linked to these abstract resources, and this published list could have a note saying conformance requires use of the relevant INSPIRE profile (an example of "conformance" being relative to the community of practice, and hard to be specific about). Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1338 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 26 March 2021 12:30:17 UTC