Re: [dxwg] Do we need a new property dcat:seriesMember defined as dcat:inSeries's inverse? (#1335)

The `SPARQL` bit.

I am slightly confused now...you say we have both properties (`dcat:seriesMember owl:inverseOf dcat:inSeries .`) - great - then you say you only need one assertion to be added to the graph (_assuming every implementations uses a graph_), - lets keep going - then you say, because we only need one  assertion (infer the other) then we only need one property. But you started off with two properties to make the point you only need one...see i am confused :-)


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1335#issuecomment-805515952 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2021 05:40:19 UTC