Re: [dxwg] Should we specialize dcterms:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307)

`dcat:inSeries` would mean
```
(catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset1)
(catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset2)
(catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset3)
(catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataseries)
(dataset1) --dcat:inSeries--> (dataseries)
(dataset2) --dcat:inSeries--> (dataseries)
(dataset3) --dcat:inSeries--> (dataseries)
```
instead of
```
(catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset1)
(catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset2)
(catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset3)
(catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataseries)
(dataseries) --dcat:hasSeriesMember--> (dataset1)
(dataseries) --dcat:hasSeriesMember--> (dataset2)
(dataseries) --dcat:hasSeriesMember--> (dataset3)
```
?

I don't see why we would switch the logic for dataseries. Until now the "bigger" class states which "smaller" objects are part of them. Catalogs include Datasets, Datasets include Distributions.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by init-dcat-ap-de
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1307#issuecomment-796515754 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 11 March 2021 07:07:56 UTC