- From: init AG via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 07:07:54 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
`dcat:inSeries` would mean ``` (catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset1) (catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset2) (catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset3) (catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataseries) (dataset1) --dcat:inSeries--> (dataseries) (dataset2) --dcat:inSeries--> (dataseries) (dataset3) --dcat:inSeries--> (dataseries) ``` instead of ``` (catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset1) (catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset2) (catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataset3) (catalog) --dcat:dataset--> (dataseries) (dataseries) --dcat:hasSeriesMember--> (dataset1) (dataseries) --dcat:hasSeriesMember--> (dataset2) (dataseries) --dcat:hasSeriesMember--> (dataset3) ``` ? I don't see why we would switch the logic for dataseries. Until now the "bigger" class states which "smaller" objects are part of them. Catalogs include Datasets, Datasets include Distributions. -- GitHub Notification of comment by init-dcat-ap-de Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1307#issuecomment-796515754 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2021 07:07:56 UTC