- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 23:06:40 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@andrea-perego - fair enough - this is a statement about service-type, which can be read as a very abstract version of a dct:Standard - where conformance (always a community practice) means implementation of some specific protocol that is classified as this service type. I think the implication of this is that the OGC should mint formal profile definitions for serviceTypes - and make each specific standard declare itself to be a profile of one-or-more service types it implements. This is do-able, and confirms the underlying assumptions about the requirement for PROF as a formalism. I'll set up these declarations and seek review from the OGC and EU usage perspective. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1338#issuecomment-808974724 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 28 March 2021 23:06:42 UTC